» Articles » PMID: 35945477

Sex-specific Treatment Characteristics and 30-day Mortality Outcomes of Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients over 70 Years of Age-results from the Prospective COVIP Study

Abstract

Purpose: Older critically ill patients with COVID-19 have been the most vulnerable during the ongoing pandemic, with men being more prone to hospitalization and severe disease than women. We aimed to explore sex-specific differences in treatment and outcome after intensive care unit (ICU) admission in this cohort.

Methods: We performed a sex-specific analysis in critically ill patients ≥ 70 yr of age with COVID-19 who were included in the international prospective multicenter COVIP study. All patients were analyzed for ICU admission and treatment characteristics. We performed a multilevel adjusted regression analysis to elucidate associations of sex with 30-day mortality.

Results: A total of 3,159 patients (69.8% male, 30.2% female; median age, 75 yr) were included. Male patients were significantly fitter than female patients as determined by the Clinical Frailty Scale (fit, 67% vs 54%; vulnerable, 14% vs 19%; frail, 19% vs 27%; P < 0.001). Male patients more often underwent tracheostomy (20% vs 14%; odds ratio [OR], 1.57; P < 0.001), vasopressor therapy (69% vs 62%; OR, 1.25; P = 0.02), and renal replacement therapy (17% vs 11%; OR, 1.96; P < 0.001). There was no difference in mechanical ventilation, life-sustaining treatment limitations, and crude 30-day mortality (50% male vs 49% female; OR, 1.11; P = 0.19), which remained true after adjustment for disease severity, frailty, age and treatment limitations (OR, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.94 to 1.45; P = 0.16).

Conclusion: In this analysis of sex-specific treatment characteristics and 30-day mortality outcomes of critically ill patients with COVID-19 ≥ 70 yr of age, we found more tracheostomy and renal replacement therapy in male vs female patients, but no significant association of patient sex with 30-day mortality.

Study Registration: www.

Clinicaltrials: gov (NCT04321265); registered 25 March 2020).

Citing Articles

In reply: Sex-specific outcomes in COVID-19: missing pieces of the puzzle.

Wolff G, Wernly B, Flaatten H, Fjolner J, Bruno R, Artigas A Can J Anaesth. 2023; 70(6):1110-1112.

PMID: 37165131 PMC: 10171910. DOI: 10.1007/s12630-023-02470-x.


Sex-specific outcomes in COVID-19: missing pieces of the puzzle.

Magoon R, Choudhary N Can J Anaesth. 2023; 70(6):1108-1109.

PMID: 37165130 PMC: 10171905. DOI: 10.1007/s12630-023-02469-4.

References
1.
Yanez N, Weiss N, Romand J, Treggiari M . COVID-19 mortality risk for older men and women. BMC Public Health. 2020; 20(1):1742. PMC: 7675386. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09826-8. View

2.
Gupta S, Hayek S, Wang W, Chan L, Mathews K, Melamed M . Factors Associated With Death in Critically Ill Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 in the US. JAMA Intern Med. 2020; 180(11):1436-1447. PMC: 7364338. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3596. View

3.
Darmon M, Dumas G . Anticipating outcomes for patients with COVID-19 and identifying prognosis patterns. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021; 21(6):744-745. PMC: 7906629. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00073-6. View

4.
Jung C, Flaatten H, Fjolner J, Bruno R, Wernly B, Artigas A . The impact of frailty on survival in elderly intensive care patients with COVID-19: the COVIP study. Crit Care. 2021; 25(1):149. PMC: 8054503. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-021-03551-3. View

5.
Samuelsson C, Sjoberg F, Karlstrom G, Nolin T, Walther S . Gender differences in outcome and use of resources do exist in Swedish intensive care, but to no advantage for women of premenopausal age. Crit Care. 2015; 19:129. PMC: 4407397. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-015-0873-1. View