» Articles » PMID: 30924863

TOP: Time-to-Event Bayesian Optimal Phase II Trial Design for Cancer Immunotherapy

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2019 Mar 30
PMID 30924863
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Immunotherapies have revolutionized cancer treatment. Unlike chemotherapies, immune agents often take longer to show benefit, and the complex and unique mechanism of action of these agents renders the use of multiple endpoints more appropriate in some trials. These new features of immunotherapy make conventional phase II trial designs, which assume a single binary endpoint that is quickly ascertainable, inefficient and dysfunctional.

Methods: We propose a flexible and efficient time-to-event Bayesian optimal phase II (TOP) design. The TOP design is efficient in that it allows real-time "go/no-go" interim decision making in the presence of late-onset responses by using all available data and maximizes statistical power for detecting effective treatments. TOP is flexible in the number of interim looks and capable of handling simple and complicated endpoints under a unified framework. We conduct simulation studies to evaluate the operating characteristics of the TOP design.

Results: In the considered trial settings, compared to some existing Bayesian designs, the TOP design shortens the trial duration by 4-10 months and improves the power to detect effective treatment up to 90%, with well-controlled type I errors.

Conclusions: The TOP design is transparent and easy to implement, as its decision rules can be tabulated and included in the protocol prior to the conduct of the trial. The TOP design provides a flexible, efficient, and easy-to-implement method to accelerate and improve the development of immunotherapies.

Citing Articles

The Win Ratio Approach in Bayesian Monitoring for Two-Arm Phase II Clinical Trial Designs With Multiple Time-To-Event Endpoints.

Huang X, Wang J, Ning J Stat Med. 2024; 43(30):5922-5934.

PMID: 39582325 PMC: 11645213. DOI: 10.1002/sim.10282.


Bayesian sequential monitoring strategies for trials of digestive cancer therapeutics.

Mulier G, Lin R, Aparicio T, Biard L BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024; 24(1):154.

PMID: 39030498 PMC: 11526600. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-024-02278-3.


A generalized calibrated Bayesian hierarchical modeling approach to basket trials with multiple endpoints.

Chi X, Yuan Y, Yu Z, Lin R Biom J. 2024; 66(2):e2300122.

PMID: 38368277 PMC: 11323483. DOI: 10.1002/bimj.202300122.


Using short-term endpoints to improve interim decision making and trial duration in two-stage phase II trials with nested binary endpoints.

Zocholl D, Kunz C, Rauch G Stat Methods Med Res. 2023; 32(9):1749-1765.

PMID: 37489267 PMC: 10540486. DOI: 10.1177/09622802231188515.


Comparison Between Simultaneous and Sequential Utilization of Safety and Efficacy for Optimal Dose Determination in Bayesian Model-Assisted Designs.

Li R, Takeda K, Rong A Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023; 57(4):728-736.

PMID: 37087525 DOI: 10.1007/s43441-023-00517-1.


References
1.
Thall P, Simon R . Practical Bayesian guidelines for phase IIB clinical trials. Biometrics. 1994; 50(2):337-49. View

2.
Okada H, Weller M, Huang R, Finocchiaro G, Gilbert M, Wick W . Immunotherapy response assessment in neuro-oncology: a report of the RANO working group. Lancet Oncol. 2015; 16(15):e534-e542. PMC: 4638131. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00088-1. View

3.
Yuan Y, Lin R, Li D, Nie L, Warren K . Time-to-Event Bayesian Optimal Interval Design to Accelerate Phase I Trials. Clin Cancer Res. 2018; 24(20):4921-4930. PMC: 6191365. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0246. View

4.
Simon R . Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1989; 10(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90015-9. View

5.
Korn E, Freidlin B . Interim Futility Monitoring Assessing Immune Therapies With a Potentially Delayed Treatment Effect. J Clin Oncol. 2018; 36(23):2444-2449. PMC: 6366306. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2018.77.7144. View