» Articles » PMID: 20581575

Randomized Phase II Trials: Time for a New Era in Clinical Trial Design

Overview
Journal J Thorac Oncol
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2010 Jun 29
PMID 20581575
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The classic single-arm oncology phase II trial designs for evaluating an experimental regimen/agent are limited by multiple sources of bias arising from the inability to separate trial effects (such as patient selection, trial eligibility, imaging techniques and assessment schedule, and treatment locations) from treatment effect on clinical outcomes. Changes in patient population based on biologic subsetting, newer imaging technologies, the use of alternative end points, constrained resources, and the multitude of promising therapies for a given disease make randomized phase II designs, with a concurrent control arm where necessary, attractive. In this brief report, we discuss the salient features of the randomized designs for phase II trials, which when properly applied under the constraints of their underlying inference framework can assure optimal use of limited phase III financial and patient resources.

Citing Articles

Randomized phase II selection trial of FLASH and conventional radiotherapy for patients with localized cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma or basal cell carcinoma: A study protocol.

Kinj R, Gaide O, Jeanneret-Sozzi W, Dafni U, Viguet-Carrin S, Sagittario E Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2024; 45:100743.

PMID: 38362466 PMC: 10867306. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100743.


Wireless Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Chronic Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN): A Proof-of-Concept Randomized Clinical Trial.

Gewandter J, Culakova E, Davis J, Gada U, Guido J, Bearden J J Pain. 2023; 25(5):104431.

PMID: 37993030 PMC: 11058028. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.11.014.


A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Hypothesized versus Observed Effect Sizes in Early Phase Cancer Prevention Clinical Trials.

Eickhoff J, Zaborek J, Chen G, Sahasrabuddhe V, Ford L, Szabo E Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2023; 16(8):471-478.

PMID: 37258421 PMC: 10527540. DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-23-0060.


Opportunities and challenges of implementing Pharmacogenomics in cancer drug development.

Tarantino P, Trapani D, Morganti S, Ferraro E, Viale G, DAmico P Cancer Drug Resist. 2022; 2(1):43-52.

PMID: 35582141 PMC: 9019172. DOI: 10.20517/cdr.2018.22.


Everolimus with or without bevacizumab in advanced pNET: CALGB 80701 (Alliance).

Kulke M, Ou F, Niedzwiecki D, Huebner L, Kunz P, Kennecke H Endocr Relat Cancer. 2022; 29(6):335-344.

PMID: 35324465 PMC: 9257687. DOI: 10.1530/ERC-21-0239.


References
1.
Rubinstein L, Korn E, Freidlin B, Hunsberger S, Ivy S, Smith M . Design issues of randomized phase II trials and a proposal for phase II screening trials. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23(28):7199-206. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.149. View

2.
Sandler A, Gray R, Perry M, Brahmer J, Schiller J, Dowlati A . Paclitaxel-carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab for non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355(24):2542-50. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa061884. View

3.
Sargent D, Goldberg R . A flexible design for multiple armed screening trials. Stat Med. 2001; 20(7):1051-60. DOI: 10.1002/sim.704. View

4.
Johnson D, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W, Herbst R, Nemunaitis J, Jablons D . Randomized phase II trial comparing bevacizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel with carboplatin and paclitaxel alone in previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22(11):2184-91. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.11.022. View

5.
Lustberg M, Bekaii-Saab T, Young D, Otterson G, Burak W, Abbas A . Phase II randomized study of two regimens of sequentially administered mitomycin C and irinotecan in patients with unresectable esophageal and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol. 2010; 5(5):713-8. PMC: 3641556. DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181d7776d. View