» Articles » PMID: 27112322

MIDAS: a Practical Bayesian Design for Platform Trials with Molecularly Targeted Agents

Overview
Journal Stat Med
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Public Health
Date 2016 Apr 27
PMID 27112322
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recent success of immunotherapy and other targeted therapies in cancer treatment has led to an unprecedented surge in the number of novel therapeutic agents that need to be evaluated in clinical trials. Traditional phase II clinical trial designs were developed for evaluating one candidate treatment at a time and thus not efficient for this task. We propose a Bayesian phase II platform design, the multi-candidate iterative design with adaptive selection (MIDAS), which allows investigators to continuously screen a large number of candidate agents in an efficient and seamless fashion. MIDAS consists of one control arm, which contains a standard therapy as the control, and several experimental arms, which contain the experimental agents. Patients are adaptively randomized to the control and experimental agents based on their estimated efficacy. During the trial, we adaptively drop inefficacious or overly toxic agents and 'graduate' the promising agents from the trial to the next stage of development. Whenever an experimental agent graduates or is dropped, the corresponding arm opens immediately for testing the next available new agent. Simulation studies show that MIDAS substantially outperforms the conventional approach. The proposed design yields a significantly higher probability for identifying the promising agents and dropping the futile agents. In addition, MIDAS requires only one master protocol, which streamlines trial conduct and substantially decreases the overhead burden. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Citing Articles

Treatment Comparisons in Adaptive Platform Trials Adjusting for Temporal Drift.

Guo B, Wang L, Yuan Y Stat Biopharm Res. 2024; 16(3):361-370.

PMID: 39184873 PMC: 11343491. DOI: 10.1080/19466315.2023.2292238.


A Bayesian adaptive biomarker stratified phase II randomized clinical trial design for radiotherapies with competing risk survival outcomes.

Park J, Hu W, Jin I, Liu H, Zang Y Stat Methods Med Res. 2023; 33(1):80-95.

PMID: 38062757 PMC: 11227940. DOI: 10.1177/09622802231215801.


Novel clinical trial design and analytic methods to tackle challenges in therapeutic development in rare diseases.

Li Y, Izem R Ann Transl Med. 2022; 10(18):1034.

PMID: 36267797 PMC: 9577738. DOI: 10.21037/atm-21-5496.


Bayesian treatment screening and selection using subgroup-specific utilities of response and toxicity.

Lee J, Thall P, Msaouel P Biometrics. 2022; 79(3):2458-2473.

PMID: 35974457 PMC: 9931950. DOI: 10.1111/biom.13738.


An Adaptive Information Borrowing Platform Design for Testing Drug Candidates of COVID-19.

Su L, Zhang J, Yan F Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2022; 2022:9293681.

PMID: 35462681 PMC: 9029212. DOI: 10.1155/2022/9293681.


References
1.
Rubinstein L, Korn E, Freidlin B, Hunsberger S, Ivy S, Smith M . Design issues of randomized phase II trials and a proposal for phase II screening trials. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23(28):7199-206. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.149. View

2.
Thall P, Simon R, Estey E . Bayesian sequential monitoring designs for single-arm clinical trials with multiple outcomes. Stat Med. 1995; 14(4):357-79. DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780140404. View

3.
Ensign L, Gehan E, Kamen D, Thall P . An optimal three-stage design for phase II clinical trials. Stat Med. 1994; 13(17):1727-36. DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780131704. View

4.
Hanfelt J, Slack R, Gehan E . A modification of Simon's optimal design for phase II trials when the criterion is median sample size. Control Clin Trials. 1999; 20(6):555-66. DOI: 10.1016/s0197-2456(99)00028-8. View

5.
Johnson V, Cook J . Bayesian design of single-arm phase II clinical trials with continuous monitoring. Clin Trials. 2009; 6(3):217-26. DOI: 10.1177/1740774509105221. View