» Articles » PMID: 30899649

How to Succeed in Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Primary Repair? Step-by-Step Technique

Overview
Journal Arthrosc Tech
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2019 Mar 23
PMID 30899649
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Historically, poor results of open primary repair of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries have been reported. It has recently been recognized that favorable outcomes of primary ACL repair are possible when selectively performed in patients with proximal tears and good tissue quality. Moreover, with arthroscopic technological advances, primary repair can be a valuable treatment option for patients with proximal tears. Preserving the native ACL has several advantages, including maintenance of native proprioceptive function and biology. The procedure is also minimally invasive and reduces the inflammatory reaction often seen in ACL reconstruction. Recently, it has been suggested that additional suture augmentation of the primary repair technique may be beneficial for protecting ligament healing during early range of motion. In this Technical Note, we present the step-by-step surgical technique of arthroscopic primary repair using a femoral suspensory device with suture augmentation.

Citing Articles

Anterior cruciate ligament primary repair revision rates are increased in skeletally mature patients under the age of 21 compared to reconstruction, while adults (>21 years) show no significant difference: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Rilk S, Goodhart G, van der List J, von Rehlingen-Prinz F, Vermeijden H, OBrien R Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2024; 33(1):29-58.

PMID: 38967267 PMC: 11716360. DOI: 10.1002/ksa.12239.


Stabilization and Gap Formation of Adjustable Versus Fixed Primary ACL Repair With Internal Brace: An in Vitro Full-Construct Biomechanical Cadaveric Study.

Bachmaier S, Smith P, Hammoud S, Ritter D, Hauck O, Wijdicks C Orthop J Sports Med. 2023; 11(9):23259671231201462.

PMID: 37786477 PMC: 10541754. DOI: 10.1177/23259671231201462.


Suture Tape Augmentation Has No Effect on Anterior Tibial Translation, Gap Formation, or Load to Failure of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair: A Biomechanical Pilot Study.

Qin C, Kahn A, Amirouche F, Beltagi A, Pradhan S, Koh J Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021; 3(1):e233-e239.

PMID: 33615270 PMC: 7879211. DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2020.09.016.


The healing potential of an acutely repaired ACL: a sequential MRI study.

Ferretti A, Monaco E, Annibaldi A, Carrozzo A, Bruschi M, Argento G J Orthop Traumatol. 2020; 21(1):14.

PMID: 32869122 PMC: 7459035. DOI: 10.1186/s10195-020-00553-9.

References
1.
Sherman M, LIEBER L, Bonamo J, Podesta L, Reiter I . The long-term followup of primary anterior cruciate ligament repair. Defining a rationale for augmentation. Am J Sports Med. 1991; 19(3):243-55. DOI: 10.1177/036354659101900307. View

2.
Murray M . Current status and potential of primary ACL repair. Clin Sports Med. 2008; 28(1):51-61. PMC: 2642924. DOI: 10.1016/j.csm.2008.08.005. View

3.
Gobbi A, Bathan L, Boldrini L . Primary repair combined with bone marrow stimulation in acute anterior cruciate ligament lesions: results in a group of athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2009; 37(3):571-8. DOI: 10.1177/0363546508327141. View

4.
Sonnery-Cottet B, Barth J, Graveleau N, Fournier Y, Hager J, Chambat P . Arthroscopic identification of isolated tear of the posterolateral bundle of the anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy. 2009; 25(7):728-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.12.018. View

5.
Claes S, Verdonk P, Forsyth R, Bellemans J . The "ligamentization" process in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: what happens to the human graft? A systematic review of the literature. Am J Sports Med. 2011; 39(11):2476-83. DOI: 10.1177/0363546511402662. View