» Articles » PMID: 27324969

Acute Proximal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears: Outcomes After Arthroscopic Suture Anchor Repair Versus Anatomic Single-Bundle Reconstruction

Overview
Journal Arthroscopy
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2016 Jun 22
PMID 27324969
Citations 71
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To compare clinical and radiologic results of primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) suture anchor repair and microfracturing with anatomic ACL single-bundle reconstruction in patients with acute proximal ACL avulsion tears.

Methods: Between January 2010 and December 2013, 420 patients underwent ACL treatment. Forty-one patients were included in this study. The inclusion criteria were as follows: unilateral acute proximal ACL rupture, concomitant meniscus lesions, no previous knee ligament surgery, and no additional ligament injuries or absence of ligament injury of the contralateral knee. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging confirming a proximal avulsion tear of the ACL was required. Patients had to undergo surgical treatment within 6 weeks after injury. Follow-up examination included Lachman and pivot-shift testing, KT-1000 measurement, and the International Knee Documentation Committee score.

Results: At a mean follow-up of 28 months (range, 24 to 31 month), 20 patients in each group were available. A mean KT-1000 arthrometer result of less than 3 mm indicated stability in all patients (P = .269). Three patients had a 1+ Lachman test (P = .072) and 4 patients had a 1+ pivot-shift test in the ACL repair group (P = .342). The International Knee Documentation Committee score results did not differ significantly (P > .99), but there was a significant correlation between poor results and failure rate (P = .001) in the refixation group. The failure rate was 15% in the ACL refixation group and 0% in the reconstruction group (P = .231). Magnetic resonance imaging confirmed homogeneous signal and proper ACL position in 100% of patients in the control group and 86% in the ACL repair group.

Conclusions: Proximal refixation of the ACL using knotless suture anchors and microfracturing restores knee stability and results in comparable functional outcomes to a control group treated with single-bundle ACL reconstruction. The results suggest that refixation of the ACL is a feasible treatment option in selected patients.

Level Of Evidence: Level III, case-control study.

Citing Articles

Primary ACL repair in a selected patient cohort: A prospective single cohort study.

Al Kindi I, Al Rawahi S, Al Ghaithi A, Al Yarubi S, Al Masakri S, Al Mutaini M J Orthop. 2024; 61:127-132.

PMID: 39492978 PMC: 11526054. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.09.020.


Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture: Evidence-Based Concepts on Reconstruction, Repair and Future Developments.

Thayaparan A, Kantharuban S Cureus. 2024; 16(8):e67956.

PMID: 39328699 PMC: 11426957. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.67956.


Anterior cruciate ligament primary repair revision rates are increased in skeletally mature patients under the age of 21 compared to reconstruction, while adults (>21 years) show no significant difference: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Rilk S, Goodhart G, van der List J, von Rehlingen-Prinz F, Vermeijden H, OBrien R Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2024; 33(1):29-58.

PMID: 38967267 PMC: 11716360. DOI: 10.1002/ksa.12239.


Clinical Results of Primary Repair Versus Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Contemporary Trials.

Kunze K, Pareek A, Nwachukwu B, Ranawat A, Pearle A, Kelly B Orthop J Sports Med. 2024; 12(6):23259671241253591.

PMID: 38867918 PMC: 11168252. DOI: 10.1177/23259671241253591.


Rate of Revision Surgery and Associated Risk Factors After Primary Arthroscopic ACL Repair With Additional Suture Augmentation.

Schneider K, Theil C, Gosheger G, Weller J, Goth A, Ahlbaeumer G Orthop J Sports Med. 2024; 12(5):23259671241244734.

PMID: 38827140 PMC: 11143819. DOI: 10.1177/23259671241244734.