» Articles » PMID: 30849076

Lower Plasma Insulin Levels During Overnight Closed-loop in School Children with Type 1 Diabetes: Potential Advantage? A Randomized Cross-over Trial

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2019 Mar 9
PMID 30849076
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Studies have shown that overnight closed-loop insulin delivery can improve glucose control and reduce the risk of hypoglycemia and hence may improve metabolic outcomes and reduce burden for children with type 1 diabetes and their families. However, research so far has not reported insulin levels while comparing closed-loop to open-loop insulin delivery in children. Therefore, in this study we obtained glucose levels as well as plasma insulin levels in children with type 1 diabetes to evaluate the efficacy of a model-based closed-loop algorithm compared to an open-loop administration.

Methods: Fifteen children with type 1 diabetes, 6-12 years, participated in this open-label single center study. We used a randomized cross over design in which we compared overnight closed-loop insulin delivery with sensor augmented pump therapy for two nights in both the hospital and at home (i.e., 1 night in-patient stay and at home per treatment condition). Only during the in-patient stay, hourly plasma insulin and blood glucose levels were assessed and are reported in this paper.

Results: Results of paired sample t-tests revealed that although plasma insulin levels were significantly lower during the closed-loop than in the open-loop (Mean difference 36.51 pmol/l; t(13) = 2.13, p = .03, effect size d = 0.57), blood glucose levels did not vary between conditions (mean difference 0.76 mmol/l; t(13) = 1.24, p = .12, d = 0.37). The administered dose of insulin was significantly lower during the closed-loop compared with the open-loop (mean difference 0.10 UI; t(12) = 2.45, p = .02, d = 0.68).

Conclusions: Lower insulin doses were delivered in the closed-loop, resulting in lower plasma insulin levels, whereby glucose levels were not affected negatively. This suggests that the closed-loop administration is better targeted and hence could be more effective.

Citing Articles

Recent advances in closed-loop insulin delivery.

Ware J, Hovorka R Metabolism. 2021; 127:154953.

PMID: 34890648 PMC: 8792215. DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2021.154953.


Insulin-delivery methods for children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

Zuberi Z, Sauli E, Cun L, Deng J, Li W, He X Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2020; 11:2042018820906016.

PMID: 32944212 PMC: 7466897. DOI: 10.1177/2042018820906016.


Exposure to Closed Loop Barriers Using Virtual Reality.

Lanning M, Shen J, Wasser D, Riddle S, Agustin B, Hood K J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2020; 14(5):837-843.

PMID: 32019329 PMC: 7753868. DOI: 10.1177/1932296820902771.

References
1.
Ghasemi A, Zahediasl S . Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for non-statisticians. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2013; 10(2):486-9. PMC: 3693611. DOI: 10.5812/ijem.3505. View

2.
Tauschmann M, Hovorka R . Insulin delivery and nocturnal glucose control in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2017; 14(12):1367-1377. PMC: 5942151. DOI: 10.1080/17425247.2017.1360866. View

3.
Libman I, Miller K, DiMeglio L, Bethin K, Katz M, Shah A . Effect of Metformin Added to Insulin on Glycemic Control Among Overweight/Obese Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015; 314(21):2241-50. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.16174. View

4.
Chowdhury S . Puberty and type 1 diabetes. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2015; 19(Suppl 1):S51-4. PMC: 4413391. DOI: 10.4103/2230-8210.155402. View

5.
Nimri R, Bratina N, Kordonouri O, Avbelj Stefanija M, Fath M, Biester T . MD-Logic overnight type 1 diabetes control in home settings: A multicentre, multinational, single blind randomized trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016; 19(4):553-561. DOI: 10.1111/dom.12852. View