» Articles » PMID: 30762740

Correlation of Cervical and Thoracic Inlet Sagittal Parameters by MRI and Radiography in Patients with Cervical Spondylosis

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2019 Feb 15
PMID 30762740
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To investigate the relationship between cervical and thoracic sagittal alignment parameters measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and x-ray in patients with cervical spondylosisData from 120 symptomatic patients who presented with cervical spondylosis between April 2015 and January 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients received both a cervical MRI and a cervical radiograph during a single visit. The thoracic inlet angle (TIA), T1 slope (T1S), neck tilt (NT), C2-C7 angle (C2-C7), and C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (C2-7 SVA) were assessed. Pearson correlation coefficient, paired t test, and linear regression models were used to analyze parameters obtained by cervical MRI and radiography.The difference in mean thoracic inlet angle x-ray (TIAX) and thoracic inlet angle MRI (TIAM) (TIAM-TIAX) (0.72 ± 5.82°) was not significant (P > .05). There were significant differences in mean T1 slope x-ray (T1SX) and T1 slope MRI (T1SM) (T1SM-T1SX) (-2.55 ± 6.14°), mean neck tilt x-ray (NTX) and neck tilt MRI (NTM) (NTM-NTX) (3.26 ± 6.01°), mean C2-C7 angle x-ray (C2-7X) and C2-C7 angle MRI (C2-7 M) (C2-7M-C2-7X) (-3.57 ± 10.00°), and mean C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis X ray (C2-7 SVAX) and C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis MRI (C2-7 SVAM) (C2-7 SVAM-C2-7 SVAX) (-4.50 ± 1.26 mm) (all P ≤ .001). There were positive correlations between TIAM and TIAX (r = 0.807), T1SM and T1SX (r = 0.581), NTM and NTX (r = 0.759), cervical loidosis MRI and cervical loidosis x-ray (r = 0.666), and SVAM and SVAX (r = 0.226).MRI may be useful to evaluate thoracic inlet and sagittal alignment parameters in patients with cervical spondylosis. Patients with cervical spondylosis may have a relatively low capacity for compensation in the cervical region.

Citing Articles

Development and validation of a predictive model for the risk of symptomatic adjacent segmental degeneration after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Liang X, Ran L, Zhang Z, Xiao X, Wang C, Du Y Front Neurol. 2025; 16:1530257.

PMID: 40035035 PMC: 11873071. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1530257.


Comparison of sagittal measurements of cervical spine in spondylosis patients between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Radiograph.

Nicolet M, - P, Kadavigere R, S Nayak S, Pendem S, Aggarwal S F1000Res. 2025; 14:45.

PMID: 39917310 PMC: 11799758. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.159504.1.


Sagittal Full-Spine vs. Sectional Cervical Lateral Radiographs: Are the Measurements of Cervical Alignment Interchangeable?.

Haas J, Oakley P, Betz J, Miller J, Jaeger J, Moustafa I J Clin Med. 2024; 13(9).

PMID: 38731030 PMC: 11084776. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13092502.


Upper and lower cervical alignment parameters measured on supine magnetic resonance imaging with the occipital slope as a key marker of cervical alignment.

Karabag H, Celal Iplikcioglu A J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2024; 15(1):61-65.

PMID: 38644912 PMC: 11029111. DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_185_23.


Radiographic Risk Factors for Adjacent Segment Disease Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Mesregah M, Baker M, Yoon C, Meisel H, Hsieh P, Wang J Global Spine J. 2024; 14(7):2183-2200.

PMID: 38469858 PMC: 11418681. DOI: 10.1177/21925682241237500.


References
1.
Urschel Jr H . Anatomy of the thoracic outlet. Thorac Surg Clin. 2008; 17(4):511-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2006.12.004. View

2.
Kuklo T, Potter B, Polly Jr D, OBrien M, Schroeder T, Lenke L . Reliability analysis for manual adolescent idiopathic scoliosis measurements. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30(4):444-54. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000153702.99342.9c. View

3.
Knott P, Mardjetko S, Techy F . The use of the T1 sagittal angle in predicting overall sagittal balance of the spine. Spine J. 2010; 10(11):994-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.08.031. View

4.
Yu L, Zhang Z, Ding Q, Li Y, Liu Y, Yin G . Relationship Between Signal Changes on T2-weighted Magnetic Resonance Images and Cervical Dynamics in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013; 28(6):E365-7. DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31829993a8. View

5.
Park J, Cho C, Song J, Kim S, Ha Y, Oh J . T1 Slope and Cervical Sagittal Alignment on Cervical CT Radiographs of Asymptomatic Persons. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2013; 53(6):356-9. PMC: 3756128. DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2013.53.6.356. View