» Articles » PMID: 37468995

Relationship Between C2 Slope with Sagittal Parameters and Clinical Function of Degenerative Cervical Kyphosis

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2023 Jul 19
PMID 37468995
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To explore the relationship between C2 slope with sagittal parameters and clinical function of degenerative cervical kyphosis (DCK).

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 127 patients with degenerative cervical spondylosis treated in our spinal deformity center from January 2019 to June 2022. Patients were categorized into two groups and compared based on C2-7 angle (C2-7 ≥ 5° as kyphosis group, C2-7 < 5° as lordosis group). Pearson correlation or Spearman correlation was used to analyze the relationship between C2S and conventional radiological parameters and health -related quality-of-life (HRQOL) outcomes as measured by the EuroQol 5 dimension questionnaire (EQ5D), NRS, and the neck disability index (NDI). The cutoff value of C2S was determined by a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Results: There were 127 patients who met inclusion criteria (79 men and 48 women). Average 56.00 ± 10.27 years old (range 31-81 years old). C2S of kyphosis group is higher than non-kyphosis group. Aggravating cervical kyphosis increases cSVA positively. For all patients, C2S demonstrated a significant correlation with the O-C2 angle, C2-7 angle, cSVA, and TS-CL (p < 0.05). NRS, NDI and EQ5D-VAS scores revealed a significant correlation with C2S and cSVA (p < 0.01). For the subgroup of patients presenting with DCK, ROC curves demonstrated the cutoff values of C2S as 26.3°, and 30.5°, according to a cSVA of 40 mm, and severe disability expressed by NDI, respectively.

Conclusion: On the basis of retaining the consistency of cranio-cervical and cervico-thoracic structure, C2S can better analyze the sagittal alignment of DCK patients than TS-CL and has good practicability in clinical application and HRQOL evaluation.

Citing Articles

Can Preoperative C2 Slope Predict Postoperative Cervical Sagittal Imbalance After Laminoplasty?.

Ruomu Q, Siyuan Q, Ben W, Yiyuan Y, Yanbin Z, Shengfa P Global Spine J. 2025; :21925682251321482.

PMID: 39965628 PMC: 11836969. DOI: 10.1177/21925682251321482.


The effect of cervical spine flexion-extension motion on odontoid parameters.

Huang L, Liu D, Xu H, Feng J, Kang T, Wei S J Orthop Surg Res. 2025; 20(1):68.

PMID: 39828697 PMC: 11743038. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-05488-7.


Comparison of the Effects of Posterior Cervical Fixation or Posterior Cervical Fixation Extending to the Upper Thoracic Region on Cervical Sagittal Alignment.

Kaya M, Ceylan D, Kacira T, Hiziroglu S, Erdin C, Kitiki Kacira O Orthop Surg. 2024; 16(10):2410-2418.

PMID: 39043611 PMC: 11456716. DOI: 10.1111/os.14167.


[Analysis of imaging characteristics and effectiveness of cervical spondylotic myelopathy with cervical kyphosis].

Lu H, Yu H, Zhang W, Chai Z, Ge X, Zhao R Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024; 38(5):542-549.

PMID: 38752239 PMC: 11096889. DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202402018.

References
1.
Oe S, Togawa D, Nakai K, Yamada T, Arima H, Banno T . The Influence of Age and Sex on Cervical Spinal Alignment Among Volunteers Aged Over 50. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015; 40(19):1487-94. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001071. View

2.
Yang K, Li X, Wang Y, Kong C, Lu S . Relationship between TIA minus C0-7 angle and C2-7 SVA: analysis of 113 symptomatic patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022; 23(1):338. PMC: 8991799. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05301-0. View

3.
Patwardhan A, Khayatzadeh S, Havey R, Voronov L, Smith Z, Kalmanson O . Cervical sagittal balance: a biomechanical perspective can help clinical practice. Eur Spine J. 2017; 27(Suppl 1):25-38. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-5367-1. View

4.
Cheng J, Liu P, Sun D, Ma Z, Liu J, Wang Z . Correlation of cervical and thoracic inlet sagittal parameters by MRI and radiography in patients with cervical spondylosis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019; 98(7):e14393. PMC: 6407955. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014393. View

5.
Knott P, Mardjetko S, Techy F . The use of the T1 sagittal angle in predicting overall sagittal balance of the spine. Spine J. 2010; 10(11):994-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.08.031. View