Development and Validation of a Predictive Model for the Risk of Symptomatic Adjacent Segmental Degeneration After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Overview

Journal Front Neurol

Specialty Neurology

Date 2025 Mar 4

PMID 40035035

Authors

Xiao Liang

Lijing Ran

Zhenyu Zhang

Xin Xiao

Congyang Wang

Yuwang Du

Hua Jiang

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: To investigate the risk factors for symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) 5 years after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and develop and evaluate predictive models.

Methods: A total of 655 patients who underwent ACDF were randomly assigned to the training set ( = 393) or validation set ( = 262) at a ratio of 6:4. Independent predictors of ASD were selected by LASSO regression and logistic regression analysis. A calibration curve, ROC curve and DCA curve were used to evaluate the model performance.

Results: LASSO regression combined with logistic regression analysis revealed that age, cervical canal stenosis, smaller T1S and smaller cervical lordosis (CL) were risk factors for ASD 5 years after surgery. Nomographic analysis using appeal factors was used to predict the risk of ASD. The area under the ROC curve was 0.711 (95% CI: 0.643-0.780) in the training set and 0.701 (95% CI: 0.618-0.785) in the validation set. The calibration curve showed no significant bias in either set. The DCA indicated that using the nomogram to predict the risk of ASD would be more accurate when the risk threshold probability was 12-53% in the training set and 6-43% in the validation set.

Conclusion: Age, cervical spinal stenosis, a smaller T1S, and a smaller CL are independent risk factors for ASD 5 years after ACDF surgery. Based on these four indicators, we constructed a new clinical prediction model that has a certain predictive effect and is conducive to clinical decision-making and treatment planning.

References

Zhang J, Cao J, Meng F, Shen Y . Cervical canal stenosis and adjacent segment degeneration after anterior cervical arthrodesis. Eur Spine J. 2015; 24(8):1590-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-3975-1. View

Scheer J, Tang J, Smith J, Acosta Jr F, Protopsaltis T, Blondel B . Cervical spine alignment, sagittal deformity, and clinical implications: a review. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013; 19(2):141-59. DOI: 10.3171/2013.4.SPINE12838. View

Lee S, Son E, Seo E, Suk K, Kim K . Factors determining cervical spine sagittal balance in asymptomatic adults: correlation with spinopelvic balance and thoracic inlet alignment. Spine J. 2013; 15(4):705-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.059. View

McAviney J, Schulz D, Bock R, Harrison D, Holland B . Determining the relationship between cervical lordosis and neck complaints. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005; 28(3):187-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.02.015. View

Li J, Li Y, Kong F, Zhang D, Zhang Y, Shen Y . Adjacent segment degeneration after single-level anterior cervical decompression and fusion: disc space distraction and its impact on clinical outcomes. J Clin Neurosci. 2014; 22(3):566-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.08.019. View

Kundu B, Eli I, Dailey A, Shah L, Mazur M . Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Abnormalities Predict Symptomatic Adjacent Segment Degeneration After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. Cureus. 2021; 13(8):e17282. PMC: 8448262. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.17282. View

Morishita Y, Naito M, Hymanson H, Miyazaki M, Wu G, Wang J . The relationship between the cervical spinal canal diameter and the pathological changes in the cervical spine. Eur Spine J. 2009; 18(6):877-83. PMC: 2899662. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-0968-y. View

Shahzad H, Alvarez P, Pallumeera M, Bhatti N, Yu E, Phillips F . Exploring the incidence and risk factors of reoperation for symptomatic adjacent segment disease following cervical decompression and fusion. N Am Spine Soc J. 2024; 17:100305. PMC: 10803933. DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2023.100305. View

Park D, Ramakrishnan P, Cho T, Lorenz E, Eck J, Humphreys S . Effect of lower two-level anterior cervical fusion on the superior adjacent level. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007; 7(3):336-40. DOI: 10.3171/SPI-07/09/336. View

10.

Basques B, Louie P, Mormol J, Khan J, Movassaghi K, Paul J . Multi- versus single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: comparing sagittal alignment, early adjacent segment degeneration, and clinical outcomes. Eur Spine J. 2018; 27(11):2745-2753. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5677-y. View

11.

Tobert D, Antoci V, Patel S, Saadat E, Bono C . Adjacent Segment Disease in the Cervical and Lumbar Spine. Clin Spine Surg. 2016; 30(3):94-101. DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000442. View

12.

Ahn S, So W, Ku M, Kim S, Kim D, Lee B . Radiologic Findings and Risk Factors of Adjacent Segment Degeneration after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion : A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study with 3-Year Follow-Up Using MRI. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2016; 59(2):129-36. PMC: 4783478. DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2016.59.2.129. View

13.

Carrier C, Bono C, Lebl D . Evidence-based analysis of adjacent segment degeneration and disease after ACDF: a systematic review. Spine J. 2013; 13(10):1370-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.05.050. View

14.

Burch M, Wiegers N, Patil S, Nourbakhsh A . Incidence and risk factors of reoperation in patients with adjacent segment disease: A meta-analysis. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2020; 11(1):9-16. PMC: 7274364. DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_10_20. View

15.

Li S, Bai B, Li Q, Yuan Q, Peng X . Predicting surgical outcome and sagittal alignment change in patients with cervical spondylosis and degenerative kyphosis after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):6704. PMC: 10130171. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-34029-7. View

16.

Zhou J, Li L, Li T, Xue Y . Preoperative Modic changes are related to axial symptoms after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. J Pain Res. 2018; 11:2617-2623. PMC: 6209067. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S172953. View

17.

Liu Y, Wang H, Li X, Chen J, Sun H, Wang G . Comparison of a zero-profile anchored spacer (ROI-C) and the polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages with an anterior plate in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J. 2016; 25(6):1881-90. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4500-x. View

18.

Jun H, Kim J, Ahn J, Chang I, Song J, Kim T . T1 slope and degenerative cervical spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014; 40(4):E220-6. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000722. View

19.

Park M, Moon S, Lee H, Kim S, Kim T, Lee S . The effect of age on cervical sagittal alignment: normative data on 100 asymptomatic subjects. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013; 38(8):E458-63. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828802c2. View

20.

Teo S, Goh G, Yeo W, Chen J, Soh R . The Relationship Between Cervical Sagittal Balance and Adjacent Segment Disease After Three-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. Clin Spine Surg. 2021; 34(5):E264-E270. DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001135. View