» Articles » PMID: 30671774

The Influence of Social Support and Social Integration Factors on Return to Work Outcomes for Individuals with Work-Related Injuries: A Systematic Review

Overview
Journal J Occup Rehabil
Publisher Springer
Date 2019 Jan 24
PMID 30671774
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose In occupational rehabilitation, the biopsychosocial model endorses the role of social factors in worker recovery. We conducted a systematic review to explore three questions examining the role of social support for the return-to-work (RTW) of individuals with work-related injury: (1) What are the worker-identified social barriers and facilitators in RTW; (2) What is the relationship between social factors and RTW; and (3) What is the effectiveness of social interventions for RTW. Methods Systematic searches of six databases were conducted for each research question. These identified 11 studies meeting inclusion criteria for Research Question 1, and 12 studies for Research Question 2. No studies were identified that met inclusion criteria for Research Question 3. A narrative synthesis approach was used to analyse the included studies. Results Research Question 1 identified five themes in social barriers and facilitators to RTW, including contact/communication, person-centred approaches, mutual trust, reaction to injury, and social relationships. Research Question 2 identified moderate support for reaction to injury and social integration/functioning as predictors of RTW and weak evidence for co-worker support. Four studies reported significant associations between social factors and RTW, six reported mixed findings with at least one significant social predictor, and two found no significant relationships. However, conclusions were limited by the inconsistency in measurement of social factors. Conclusions Our findings indicate that social support and integration may influence RTW following work-related injury, and highlights the need for further systematic examination of social factors in the field of occupational rehabilitation.

Citing Articles

Uncovering Mental Health Profiles of Workers with a Physically Disabling Injury or Illness Using the Complete State Mental Health Framework.

Dobson K, Chien Y, Carnide N, Furlan A, Smith P, Mustard C J Occup Rehabil. 2024; .

PMID: 39607657 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-024-10254-3.


Early vocational rehabilitation and psychological support for trauma patients to improve return to work (the ROWTATE trial): study protocol for an individually randomised controlled multicentre pragmatic trial.

Kendrick D, Lindley R, Blackburn L, Roadevin C, Thompson E, Andrews I Trials. 2024; 25(1):439.

PMID: 38956682 PMC: 11221047. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08183-w.


One-year outcomes of traumatic injuries among survivors in Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study on the employment outcomes and functioning state.

Ahmed A, Lysaght R, Addissie A, Zewdie A, Finlayson M Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2024; 9(1):e001209.

PMID: 38646619 PMC: 11029386. DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2023-001209.


"I'm pulling through because of you": injured workers' perspective of workplace factors supporting return to work under the Saskatchewan Workers' Compensation Board scheme.

Lewis I, Houdmont J Front Rehabil Sci. 2024; 5:1373888.

PMID: 38560027 PMC: 10978658. DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1373888.


Exploring the status and associated factors of the readiness for return-to-work in young and middle-aged stroke patients.

Liu Z, Li J, Liu F, Guan N, Li Y, Zhang Y Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):2841.

PMID: 38310121 PMC: 10838315. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-53262-2.


References
1.
Reme S, Shaw W, Steenstra I, Woiszwillo M, Pransky G, Linton S . Distressed, immobilized, or lacking employer support? A sub-classification of acute work-related low back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2012; 22(4):541-52. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-012-9370-4. View

2.
Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M . Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015; 350:g7647. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g7647. View

3.
White M, Wagner S, Schultz I, Murray E, Bradley S, Hsu V . Non-modifiable worker and workplace risk factors contributing to workplace absence: A stakeholder-centred synthesis of systematic reviews. Work. 2015; 52(2):353-73. DOI: 10.3233/WOR-152134. View

4.
Bartys S, Frederiksen P, Bendix T, Burton K . System influences on work disability due to low back pain: An international evidence synthesis. Health Policy. 2017; 121(8):903-912. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.05.011. View

5.
Jetha A, LaMontagne A, Lilley R, Hogg-Johnson S, Sim M, Smith P . Workplace Social System and Sustained Return-to-Work: A Study of Supervisor and Co-worker Supportiveness and Injury Reaction. J Occup Rehabil. 2017; 28(3):486-494. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-017-9724-z. View