» Articles » PMID: 26409377

Non-modifiable Worker and Workplace Risk Factors Contributing to Workplace Absence: A Stakeholder-centred Synthesis of Systematic Reviews

Overview
Journal Work
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2015 Sep 28
PMID 26409377
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Workplace stakeholders report the identification and translation of relevant high quality research to inform workplace disability policy and practice is a challenge. The present study engaged academic and community stakeholders in conducting a best evidence-synthesis to identify non-modifiable risk and protective worker and workplace factors impacting work-related absence across a variety of health conditions.

Objective: To identify non-modifiable worker and workplace disability risk and protective factors impacting work-related absence across common health conditions.

Methods: The research team searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, BusinessSource-Complete, and ABI/Inform from 2000 to 2011. Quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods systematic reviews of work-focused population were considered for inclusion. Two or more reviewers independently reviewed articles for inclusion and methodological screening.

Results: The search strategy, including expert input and grey literature, led to the identification of 2,467 unique records. From this initial search, 2325 were eliminated by title or abstract review, 142 articles underwent comprehensive review to assess for inclusion, 26 systematic reviews met eligibility criteria for this synthesis. For non-modifiable worker and workplace factors we found consistent evidence across two or more health conditions for increased risk of disability in situations where workers experience lower education, older age, emotional distress, poor personal functioning, decreased physical functioning, psychological symptoms, overweight status, and greater sick leave history.

Limitations: Heterogeneity of existing literature due to differences in outcome measures, definitions and research designs limited ability to assess effect size and results reflect findings limited to English-language papers.

Citing Articles

Systematic review and tools appraisal of prognostic factors of return to work in workers on sick leave due to musculoskeletal and common mental disorders.

Villotti P, Kordsmeyer A, Roy J, Corbiere M, Negrini A, Lariviere C PLoS One. 2024; 19(7):e0307284.

PMID: 39018306 PMC: 11253986. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307284.


"I'm pulling through because of you": injured workers' perspective of workplace factors supporting return to work under the Saskatchewan Workers' Compensation Board scheme.

Lewis I, Houdmont J Front Rehabil Sci. 2024; 5:1373888.

PMID: 38560027 PMC: 10978658. DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1373888.


Using the Functional Comorbidity Index with administrative workers' compensation data: Utility, validity, and caveats.

Sears J, Rundell S, Fulton-Kehoe D, Hogg-Johnson S, Franklin G Am J Ind Med. 2023; 67(2):99-109.

PMID: 37982343 PMC: 10824282. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.23550.


Return-to-Work Experiences in Ontario Policing: Injured But Not Broken.

Van Eerd D, Le Pouesard M, Yanar B, Irvin E, Gignac M, Jetha A J Occup Rehabil. 2023; 34(1):265-277.

PMID: 37735312 PMC: 10899295. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-023-10135-1.


What is pain: Are cognitive and social features core components?.

Craig K, MacKenzie N Paediatr Neonatal Pain. 2022; 3(3):106-118.

PMID: 35547951 PMC: 8975232. DOI: 10.1002/pne2.12046.