» Articles » PMID: 22476607

Intervention Characteristics That Facilitate Return to Work After Sickness Absence: a Systematic Literature Review

Overview
Journal J Occup Rehabil
Publisher Springer
Date 2012 Apr 6
PMID 22476607
Citations 81
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: In many Western countries, a vast amount of interventions exist that aim to facilitate return to work (RTW) after sickness absence. These interventions are usually focused on specific target populations such as employees with low back pain, stress-related complaints or adjustment disorders. The aim of the present study is to detect and identify characteristics of RTW interventions that generally facilitate return to work (i.e. in multiple target populations and across interventions). This type of knowledge is highly relevant to policy makers and health practitioners who want to deliver evidence based care that supports the employee's health and participation in labour.

Methods: We performed a keyword search (systematic literature review) in seven databases (period: 1994-2010). In total, 23 articles were included and assessed for their methodological quality. The characteristics of the interventions were evaluated as well.

Results: Early interventions, initiated in the first 6 weeks of the RTW process were scarce. These were effective to support RTW though. Multidisciplinary interventions appeared effective to support RTW in multiple target groups (e.g. back pain and adjustment disorders). Time contingent interventions in which activities followed a pre-defined schedule were effective in all physical complaints studied in this review. Activating interventions such as gradual RTW were effective in physical complaints. They have not been studied for people with psychological complaints.

Conclusions: Early- and multidisciplinary intervention and time-contingent-, activating interventions appear most effective to support RTW.

Citing Articles

Does rehabilitation improve work participation in patients with chronic spinal pain after spinal surgery: a systematic review.

Callens J, Lavreysen O, Goudman L, De Smedt A, Putman K, Van de Velde D J Rehabil Med. 2025; 57:jrm25156.

PMID: 39749418 PMC: 11681149. DOI: 10.2340/jrm.v57.25156.


Work participation after receiving multidisciplinary treatment or acceptance and commitment therapy intervention for return to work: long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial among sick-listed individuals with mental disorders and/or....

Berglund E, Anderzen I, Helgesson M, Lytsy P, Andersen A BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):3558.

PMID: 39709368 PMC: 11663356. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-21116-1.


Occupational support following arthroplasty of the lower limb (OPAL): trial protocol for a UK-wide phase III randomised controlled trial.

Sheehan L, Woodward A, Archer M, Jordan C, Martland M, McDonald D BMJ Open. 2024; 14(9):e085962.

PMID: 39284693 PMC: 11409380. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085962.


Cost-Effectiveness of a Multi-faceted Workplace Intervention to Reduce Musculoskeletal Pain in Nursing Staff: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial (INTEVAL_Spain).

Soler-Font M, Aznar-Lou I, Almansa J, Pena P, Silva-Penaherrera M, Serra C J Occup Rehabil. 2024; .

PMID: 39102106 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-024-10227-6.


Elements of Return-to-Work Interventions for Workers on Long-Term Sick Leave: A Systematic Literature Review.

de Geus C, Huysmans M, van Rijssen H, de Maaker-Berkhof M, Schoonmade L, Anema J J Occup Rehabil. 2024; .

PMID: 38849612 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-024-10203-0.


References
1.
Armijo-Olivo S, Stiles C, Hagen N, Biondo P, Cummings G . Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010; 18(1):12-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01516.x. View

2.
Tveito T, Hysing M, Eriksen H . Low back pain interventions at the workplace: a systematic literature review. Occup Med (Lond). 2004; 54(1):3-13. DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqg109. View

3.
Ektor-Andersen J, Ingvarsson E, Kullendorff M, Orbaek P . High cost-benefit of early team-based biomedical and cognitive-behaviour intervention for long-term pain-related sickness absence. J Rehabil Med. 2008; 40(1):1-8. DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0127. View

4.
Franche R, Cullen K, Clarke J, Irvin E, Sinclair S, Frank J . Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2005; 15(4):607-31. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-005-8038-8. View

5.
Braathen T, Veiersted K, Heggenes J . Improved work ability and return to work following vocational multidisciplinary rehabilitation of subjects on long-term sick leave. J Rehabil Med. 2007; 39(6):493-9. DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0081. View