» Articles » PMID: 30665273

Improving Exclusive Breastfeeding in Low and Middle-income Countries: A Systematic Review

Overview
Date 2019 Jan 22
PMID 30665273
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) rates until 6 months in most low and middle income countries (LMICs) are well below the 90% World Health Organization benchmark. This systematic review sought to provide evidence on effectiveness of various interventions on EBF until 6 months in LMICs, compared with standard care. Experimental and observational studies with concurrent comparator promoting EBF, conducted in LMICs with high country rates of breastfeeding initiation, were included. Studies were identified from a systematic review and PUBMED, Cochrane, and CABI databases. Study selection, data abstraction, and quality assessment were carried out independently and in duplicate. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for individual studies and pooled. High heterogeneity was explored through prespecified subgroup analyses for the primary outcome (EBF until 6 months) by context and by intervention for the randomized controlled trials. Prediction intervals were calculated for each effect estimate. Sixty-seven studies with 79 comparisons from 30 LMICs were included. At 6 months, intervention group infants were more likely to be exclusively breastfed than controls (RR = 2.19, 95% CI [1.73, 2.77]; I 78.4%; 25 randomized controlled trials). Larger effects were obtained from interventions delivered by a combination of professional and laypersons (RR 3.90, 95% CI [1.25, 12.21]; I 46.7%), in interventions spanning antenatal and post-natal periods (RR 2.40, 95% CI [1.70, 3.38]; I 83.6%), and when intensity was between four to eight contacts/sessions (RR 3.20, 95% CI [2.30, 4.45]; I 53.8%). Almost every intervention conducted in LMICs increased EBF rates; choice of intervention should therefore be driven by feasibility of delivery in the local context to reduce infant mortality.

Citing Articles

Effect of Group Antenatal Care on Breastfeeding Knowledge and Practices Among Pregnant Women in Ghana: Findings from a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.

Lanyo T, Williams J, Ghosh B, Apetorgbor V, Kukula V, Zielinski R Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025; 21(12.

PMID: 39767428 PMC: 11675846. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21121587.


Mobile applications for promoting and supporting breastfeeding: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ziebart M, Kammermeier M, Koletzko B, Patro-Golab B Matern Child Nutr. 2024; 21(1):e13733.

PMID: 39390945 PMC: 11650046. DOI: 10.1111/mcn.13733.


Impact of an intervention for perinatal anxiety on breastfeeding: findings from the Happy Mother-Healthy Baby randomized controlled trial in Pakistan.

Nisar A, Xiang H, Perin J, Malik A, Zaidi A, Atif N Int Breastfeed J. 2024; 19(1):53.

PMID: 39095863 PMC: 11295719. DOI: 10.1186/s13006-024-00655-8.


Impact of mHealth interventions on maternal, newborn, and child health from conception to 24 months postpartum in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.

Knop M, Nagashima-Hayashi M, Lin R, Saing C, Ung M, Oy S BMC Med. 2024; 22(1):196.

PMID: 38750486 PMC: 11095039. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03417-9.


Do timing and frequency of antenatal care make a difference in maternal micronutrient intake and breastfeeding practices? Insights from a multi-country study in South Asia.

Islam M, Zobair K PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024; 4(3):e0002993.

PMID: 38437199 PMC: 10911624. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002993.


References
1.
Perez-Escamilla R, Moran V . Scaling up breastfeeding programmes in a complex adaptive world. Matern Child Nutr. 2016; 12(3):375-80. PMC: 6860150. DOI: 10.1111/mcn.12335. View

2.
Sinha B, Chowdhury R, Sankar M, Martines J, Taneja S, Mazumder S . Interventions to improve breastfeeding outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr. 2015; 104(467):114-34. DOI: 10.1111/apa.13127. View

3.
Renfrew M, McCormick F, Wade A, Quinn B, Dowswell T . Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; (5):CD001141. PMC: 3966266. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001141.pub4. View

4.
Victora C, Bahl R, Barros A, Franca G, Horton S, Krasevec J . Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet. 2016; 387(10017):475-90. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01024-7. View

5.
Jolly K, Ingram L, Khan K, Deeks J, Freemantle N, MacArthur C . Systematic review of peer support for breastfeeding continuation: metaregression analysis of the effect of setting, intensity, and timing. BMJ. 2012; 344:d8287. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d8287. View