A Systematic Review of the Feasibility, Acceptability, and Efficacy of Online Supportive Care Interventions Targeting Men with a History of Prostate Cancer

Overview

Journal J Cancer Surviv

Specialty Oncology

Date 2019 Jan 6

PMID 30610736

Citations 24

Authors

Cynthia C Forbes

Amy Finlay

Megan McIntosh

Shihab Siddiquee

Camille E Short

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of online supportive care interventions targeting prostate cancer survivors (PCS).

Methods: Studies were identified through structured searches of PubMed, Embase and PsycINFO databases, and bibliographic review. Inclusion criteria were (1) examined feasibility, acceptability, or efficacy of an online intervention designed to improve supportive care outcomes for PCS; (2) presented outcome data collected from PCS separately (if mixed cancer); and (3) evaluated efficacy outcomes using randomized controlled trial (RCT) design.

Results: Sixteen studies met inclusion criteria; ten were classified as RCTs. Overall, 2446 men (average age 64 years) were included. Studies reported on the following outcomes: feasibility and acceptability of an online intervention (e.g., patient support, online medical record/follow-ups, or decision aids); reducing decisional conflict/distress; improving cancer-related distress and health-related quality of life; and satisfaction with cancer care.

Conclusion: We found good preliminary evidence for online supportive care among PCS, but little high level evidence. Generally, the samples were small and unrepresentative. Further, inadequate acceptability measures made it difficult to determine actual PCS acceptability and satisfaction, and lack of control groups precluded strong conclusions regarding efficacy. Translation also appears minimal; few interventions are still publicly available. Larger trials with appropriate control groups and greater emphasis on translation of effective interventions is recommended.

Implications For Cancer Survivors: Prostate cancer survivors have a variety of unmet supportive care needs. Using online delivery to improve the reach of high-quality supportive care programs could have a positive impact on health-related quality of life among PCS.

Citing Articles

A digital and nurse-led support intervention, first year after prostate cancer treatment: a single-arm feasibility study in a Swedish primary care setting.

Kelmendi N, Langius-Eklof A, Taloyan M, Sundberg K, Craftman A, Nilsson M BMC Prim Care. 2024; 25(1):409.

PMID: 39627731 PMC: 11613876. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02669-x.

A Non-Randomized Comparison of Online and In-Person Formats of the Canadian Androgen Deprivation Therapy Educational Program: Impacts on Side Effects, Bother, and Self-Efficacy.

Walker L, Sears C, Wibowo E, Robinson J, Matthew A, McLeod D Curr Oncol. 2024; 31(9):5040-5056.

PMID: 39330001 PMC: 11431469. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31090373.

Effectiveness of web-based intervention on reducing symptom burden, improving self-management capabilities and self-efficacy among prostate cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

Li Y, Zhu K, Wang L, Zhang Y, Hou S, Wang W BMJ Open. 2024; 14(5):e082709.

PMID: 38821569 PMC: 11149145. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082709.

Barriers and facilitators for recruiting and retaining male participants into longitudinal health research: a systematic review.

Borg D, Haritopoulou-Sinanidou M, Gabrovska P, Tseng H, Honeyman D, Schweitzer D BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024; 24(1):46.

PMID: 38389065 PMC: 10882922. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-024-02163-z.

Digital health and telehealth in cancer care: a scoping review of reviews.

Shaffer K, Turner K, Siwik C, Gonzalez B, Upasani R, Glazer J Lancet Digit Health. 2023; 5(5):e316-e327.

PMID: 37100545 PMC: 10124999. DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00049-3.

References

Haberlin C, ODwyer T, Mockler D, Moran J, ODonnell D, Broderick J . The use of eHealth to promote physical activity in cancer survivors: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer. 2018; 26(10):3323-3336. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4305-z. View

Ruland C, Maffei R, Borosund E, Krahn A, Andersen T, Grimsbo G . Evaluation of different features of an eHealth application for personalized illness management support: cancer patients' use and appraisal of usefulness. Int J Med Inform. 2013; 82(7):593-603. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.02.007. View

Short C, Gelder C, Binnewerg L, McIntosh M, Turnbull D . Examining the accessibility of high-quality physical activity behaviour change support freely available online for men with prostate cancer. J Cancer Surviv. 2017; 12(1):10-17. DOI: 10.1007/s11764-017-0638-8. View

Chambers S, Pinnock C, Lepore S, Hughes S, OConnell D . A systematic review of psychosocial interventions for men with prostate cancer and their partners. Patient Educ Couns. 2011; 85(2):e75-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.027. View

Chambers S, Hyde M, Laurie K, Legg M, Frydenberg M, Davis I . Experiences of Australian men diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2018; 8(2):e019917. PMC: 5855292. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019917. View

Viers B, Lightner D, Rivera M, Tollefson M, Boorjian S, Karnes R . Efficiency, satisfaction, and costs for remote video visits following radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Eur Urol. 2015; 68(4):729-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.002. View

Lange L, Fink J, Bleich C, Graefen M, Schulz H . Effectiveness, acceptance and satisfaction of guided chat groups in psychosocial aftercare for outpatients with prostate cancer after prostatectomy. Internet Interv. 2018; 9:57-64. PMC: 6096258. DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2017.06.001. View

McAlpine H, Joubert L, Martin-Sanchez F, Merolli M, Drummond K . A systematic review of types and efficacy of online interventions for cancer patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2014; 98(3):283-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.11.002. View

Cormie P, Oliffe J, Wootten A, Galvao D, Newton R, Chambers S . Improving psychosocial health in men with prostate cancer through an intervention that reinforces masculine values - exercise. Psychooncology. 2015; 25(2):232-5. DOI: 10.1002/pon.3867. View

10.

Ruland C, Jeneson A, Andersen T, Andersen R, Slaughter L, Bente-Schjodt-Osmo . Designing tailored Internet support to assist cancer patients in illness management. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008; :635-9. PMC: 2655776. View

11.

Courneya K, Rogers L, Campbell K, Vallance J, Friedenreich C . Top 10 research questions related to physical activity and cancer survivorship. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2015; 86(2):107-16. DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2015.991265. View

12.

Hong Y, Pena-Purcell N, Ory M . Outcomes of online support and resources for cancer survivors: a systematic literature review. Patient Educ Couns. 2011; 86(3):288-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.06.014. View

13.

Han J, Hou J, Kim E, Gustafson D . Lurking as an active participation process: a longitudinal investigation of engagement with an online cancer support group. Health Commun. 2013; 29(9):911-23. PMC: 4469645. DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2013.816911. View

14.

Hyde M, Newton R, Galvao D, Gardiner R, Occhipinti S, Lowe A . Men's help-seeking in the first year after diagnosis of localised prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2016; 26(2). PMC: 5347946. DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12497. View

15.

de Boer M, Waterlander W, Kuijper L, Steenhuis I, Twisk J . Testing for baseline differences in randomized controlled trials: an unhealthy research behavior that is hard to eradicate. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015; 12:4. PMC: 4310023. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-015-0162-z. View

16.

Wootten A, Abbott J, Meyer D, Chisholm K, Austin D, Klein B . Preliminary results of a randomised controlled trial of an online psychological intervention to reduce distress in men treated for localised prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2014; 68(3):471-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.024. View

17.

Fleisher L, Wen K, Miller S, Diefenbach M, Stanton A, Ropka M . Development and utilization of complementary communication channels for treatment decision making and survivorship issues among cancer patients: The CIS Research Consortium Experience. Internet Interv. 2016; 2(4):392-398. PMC: 4740910. DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2015.09.002. View

18.

Nanton V, Appleton R, Loew J, Ahmed N, Ahmedzai S, Dale J . Men don't talk about their health, but will they CHAT? The potential of online holistic needs assessment in prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2017; 121(4):494-496. DOI: 10.1111/bju.14114. View

19.

Martin E, Basen-Engquist K, Cox M, Lyons E, Carmack C, Blalock J . Interest in Health Behavior Intervention Delivery Modalities Among Cancer Survivors: A Cross-Sectional Study. JMIR Cancer. 2017; 2(1):e1. PMC: 5369635. DOI: 10.2196/cancer.5247. View

20.

Miller K, Siegel R, Lin C, Mariotto A, Kramer J, Rowland J . Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016; 66(4):271-89. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21349. View