Implementability of Healthcare Interventions: an Overview of Reviews and Development of a Conceptual Framework

Overview

Journal Implement Sci

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Health Services

Date 2022 Jan 28

PMID 35086538

Authors

Marlena Klaic

Suzanne Kapp

Peter Hudson

Wendy Chapman

Linda Denehy

David Story

Jill J Francis

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Implementation research may play an important role in reducing research waste by identifying strategies that support translation of evidence into practice. Implementation of healthcare interventions is influenced by multiple factors including the organisational context, implementation strategies and features of the intervention as perceived by people delivering and receiving the intervention. Recently, concepts relating to perceived features of interventions have been gaining traction in published literature, namely, acceptability, fidelity, feasibility, scalability and sustainability. These concepts may influence uptake of healthcare interventions, yet there seems to be little consensus about their nature and impact. The aim of this paper is to develop a testable conceptual framework of implementability of healthcare interventions that includes these five concepts.

Methods: A multifaceted approach was used to develop and refine a conceptual framework of implementability of healthcare interventions. An overview of reviews identified reviews published between January 2000 and March 2021 that focused on at least one of the five concepts in relation to a healthcare intervention. These findings informed the development of a preliminary framework of implementability of healthcare interventions which was presented to a panel of experts. A nominal group process was used to critique, refine and agree on a final framework.

Results: A total of 252 publications were included in the overview of reviews. Of these, 32% were found to be feasible, 4% reported sustainable changes in practice and 9% were scaled up to other populations and/or settings. The expert panel proposed that scalability and sustainability of a healthcare intervention are dependent on its acceptability, fidelity and feasibility. Furthermore, acceptability, fidelity and feasibility require re-evaluation over time and as the intervention is developed and then implemented in different settings or with different populations. The final agreed framework of implementability provides the basis for a chronological, iterative approach to planning for wide-scale, long-term implementation of healthcare interventions.

Conclusions: We recommend that researchers consider the factors acceptability, fidelity and feasibility (proposed to influence sustainability and scalability) during the preliminary phases of intervention development, evaluation and implementation, and iteratively check these factors in different settings and over time.

Citing Articles

Service-level interventions to reduce waiting time in outpatient and community health settings may be sustained: a systematic review.

Manderson K, Taylor N, Lewis A, Harding K BMJ Open Qual. 2025; 14(1).

PMID: 40054995 PMC: 11891526. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003235.

Polysomnographic titration of non-invasive ventilation in motor neurone disease (3TLA): protocol for a process evaluation of a clinical trial.

Graco M, Berlowitz D, Sawyer A, Holland A, Carey K, Ahamed Y Trials. 2025; 26(1):79.

PMID: 40050976 PMC: 11884123. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-025-08784-z.

Implementation of the virtual transitional care stroke intervention for older adults with stroke and multimorbidity: A qualitative descriptive study.

Markle-Reid M, Fisher K, Walker K, Cameron J, Dayler D, Fleck R J Multimorb Comorb. 2025; 15:26335565251323748.

PMID: 40013060 PMC: 11863252. DOI: 10.1177/26335565251323748.

"I Got My Trophy": The Story of Implementing a Neuro-Oncology Exercise Program from the Patient and Caregiver Lens-A Qualitative Study.

Daun J, Bansal M, Iversen R, McDonough M, Urgoiti G, Dhruva T Curr Oncol. 2025; 32(2).

PMID: 39996911 PMC: 11853919. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol32020111.

Conceptualizing the implementation of post-discharge malaria chemoprevention in Malawi using a co-design approach.

Ndambo M, Baeroe K, Phiri K, Chiumia I, Teig I, Robberstad B Malar J. 2025; 24(1):51.

PMID: 39972481 PMC: 11837697. DOI: 10.1186/s12936-025-05265-1.

References

Lauckner C, Whitten P . The State and Sustainability of Telepsychiatry Programs. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2015; 43(2):305-18. PMC: 4577299. DOI: 10.1007/s11414-015-9461-z. View

Squires J, Graham I, Bashir K, Nadalin-Penno L, Lavis J, Francis J . Understanding context: A concept analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2019; 75(12):3448-3470. DOI: 10.1111/jan.14165. View

Learmonth Y, Motl R . Important considerations for feasibility studies in physical activity research involving persons with multiple sclerosis: a scoping systematic review and case study. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2017; 4:1. PMC: 5466777. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-017-0145-8. View

Griffin J, Ridgeway K, Montgomery E, Torjesen K, Clark R, Peterson J . Vaginal ring acceptability and related preferences among women in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. PLoS One. 2019; 14(11):e0224898. PMC: 6839883. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224898. View

Pollock A, Campbell P, Brunton G, Hunt H, Estcourt L . Selecting and implementing overview methods: implications from five exemplar overviews. Syst Rev. 2017; 6(1):145. PMC: 5516331. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-017-0534-3. View

Crespo-Gonzalez C, Benrimoj S, Scerri M, Garcia-Cardenas V . Sustainability of innovations in healthcare: A systematic review and conceptual framework for professional pharmacy services. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020; 16(10):1331-1343. DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.01.015. View

Forsetlund L, Bjorndal A, Rashidian A, Jamtvedt G, OBrien M, Wolf F . Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; (2):CD003030. PMC: 7138253. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003030.pub2. View

Stephen C, McInnes S, Halcomb E . The feasibility and acceptability of nurse-led chronic disease management interventions in primary care: An integrative review. J Adv Nurs. 2017; 74(2):279-288. DOI: 10.1111/jan.13450. View

Shediac-Rizkallah M, BONE L . Planning for the sustainability of community-based health programs: conceptual frameworks and future directions for research, practice and policy. Health Educ Res. 1998; 13(1):87-108. DOI: 10.1093/her/13.1.87. View

10.

Sheffield K, Woods-Giscombe C . Efficacy, Feasibility, and Acceptability of Perinatal Yoga on Women's Mental Health and Well-Being: A Systematic Literature Review. J Holist Nurs. 2015; 34(1):64-79. PMC: 6739069. DOI: 10.1177/0898010115577976. View

11.

Kastner M, Bhattacharyya O, Hayden L, Makarski J, Estey E, Durocher L . Guideline uptake is influenced by six implementability domains for creating and communicating guidelines: a realist review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015; 68(5):498-509. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.12.013. View

12.

Huybrechts I, Declercq A, Verte E, Raeymaeckers P, Anthierens S . The Building Blocks of Implementation Frameworks and Models in Primary Care: A Narrative Review. Front Public Health. 2021; 9:675171. PMC: 8369196. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.675171. View

13.

Shek A, Biondi A, Ballard D, Wykes T, Simblett S . Technology-based interventions for mental health support after stroke: A systematic review of their acceptability and feasibility. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2019; 31(3):432-452. DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2019.1701501. View

14.

Gagliardi A, Brouwers M, Palda V, Lemieux-Charles L, Grimshaw J . How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability. Implement Sci. 2011; 6:26. PMC: 3072935. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-26. View

15.

Herlitz L, Macintyre H, Osborn T, Bonell C . The sustainability of public health interventions in schools: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2020; 15(1):4. PMC: 6945701. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-019-0961-8. View

16.

Padmanathan P, De Silva M . The acceptability and feasibility of task-sharing for mental healthcare in low and middle income countries: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2013; 97:82-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.08.004. View

17.

Sohn H, Tucker A, Ferguson O, Gomes I, Dowdy D . Costing the implementation of public health interventions in resource-limited settings: a conceptual framework. Implement Sci. 2020; 15(1):86. PMC: 7526415. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-020-01047-2. View

18.

Greenhalgh T, Hinton L, Finlay T, Macfarlane A, Fahy N, Clyde B . Frameworks for supporting patient and public involvement in research: Systematic review and co-design pilot. Health Expect. 2019; 22(4):785-801. PMC: 6737756. DOI: 10.1111/hex.12888. View

19.

Leape L, Park R, Kahan J, Brook R . Group judgments of appropriateness: the effect of panel composition. Qual Assur Health Care. 1992; 4(2):151-9. View

20.

Chapman D, Morel K, Anderson A, Damio G, Perez-Escamilla R . Breastfeeding peer counseling: from efficacy through scale-up. J Hum Lact. 2010; 26(3):314-26. PMC: 3115698. DOI: 10.1177/0890334410369481. View