» Articles » PMID: 26855885

Development and Utilization of Complementary Communication Channels for Treatment Decision Making and Survivorship Issues Among Cancer Patients: The CIS Research Consortium Experience

Overview
Journal Internet Interv
Date 2016 Feb 9
PMID 26855885
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Cancer patients and survivors are assuming active roles in decision-making and digital patient support tools are widely used to facilitate patient engagement. As part of Cancer Information Service Research Consortium's randomized controlled trials focused on the efficacy of eHealth interventions to promote informed treatment decision-making for newly diagnosed prostate and breast cancer patients, and post-treatment breast cancer, we conducted a rigorous process evaluation to examine the actual use of and perceived benefits of two complementary communication channels -- print and eHealth interventions.

Methods: The three Virtual Cancer Information Service (V-CIS) interventions were developed through a rigorous developmental process, guided by self-regulatory theory, informed decision-making frameworks, and health communications best practices. Control arm participants received NCI print materials; experimental arm participants received the additional V-CIS patient support tool. Actual usage data from the web-based V-CIS was also obtained and reported.

Results: Print materials were highly used by all groups. About 60% of the experimental group reported using the V-CIS. Those who did use the V-CIS rated it highly on improvements in knowledge, patient-provider communication and decision-making.

Conclusion: The findings show that how patients actually use eHealth interventions either singularly or within the context of other communication channels is complex.

Practice Implications: Integrating rigorous best practices and theoretical foundations is essential and multiple communication approaches should be considered to support patient preferences.

Citing Articles

Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.

Stacey D, Lewis K, Smith M, Carley M, Volk R, Douglas E Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024; 1:CD001431.

PMID: 38284415 PMC: 10823577. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub6.


Nurse-led consultations reinforced with eHealth technology: a qualitative study of the experiences of patients with gynecological cancer.

Skorstad M, Vistad I, Fegran L, Berntsen S, Johannessen B BMC Nurs. 2022; 21(1):326.

PMID: 36434602 PMC: 9701034. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-022-01104-9.


A systematic review of the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of online supportive care interventions targeting men with a history of prostate cancer.

Forbes C, Finlay A, McIntosh M, Siddiquee S, Short C J Cancer Surviv. 2019; 13(1):75-96.

PMID: 30610736 PMC: 6394465. DOI: 10.1007/s11764-018-0729-1.


Patients and caregivers' unmet information needs in the field of patient education: results from an Italian multicenter exploratory survey.

Truccolo I, Mazzocut M, Cipolat Mis C, Bidoli E, Zotti P, Flora S Support Care Cancer. 2018; 27(6):2023-2030.

PMID: 30191387 PMC: 6499737. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4439-z.


Development of the Cancer Survivor Profile-Breast Cancer (CSPro-BC) app: patient and nurse perspectives on a new navigation tool.

Gehrke A, Lee S, Hilton K, Ganster B, Trupp R, Mccullough C J Cancer Surviv. 2018; 12(3):291-305.

PMID: 29524014 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-017-0668-2.

References
1.
Elwyn G, Kreuwel I, Durand M, Sivell S, Joseph-Williams N, Evans R . How to develop web-based decision support interventions for patients: a process map. Patient Educ Couns. 2010; 82(2):260-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.04.034. View

2.
Dorfman C, Williams R, Kassan E, Red S, Dawson D, Tuong W . The development of a web- and a print-based decision aid for prostate cancer screening. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010; 10:12. PMC: 2845091. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-10-12. View

3.
Hawn C . Take two aspirin and tweet me in the morning: how Twitter, Facebook, and other social media are reshaping health care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009; 28(2):361-8. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.361. View

4.
OConnor A, Wennberg J, Legare F, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Moulton B, Sepucha K . Toward the 'tipping point': decision aids and informed patient choice. Health Aff (Millwood). 2007; 26(3):716-25. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.3.716. View

5.
Fleisher L, Ruggieri D, Miller S, Manne S, Albrecht T, Buzaglo J . Application of best practice approaches for designing decision support tools: the preparatory education about clinical trials (PRE-ACT) study. Patient Educ Couns. 2014; 96(1):63-71. PMC: 4171039. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.04.009. View