» Articles » PMID: 30575746

Optimized Libraries for CRISPR-Cas9 Genetic Screens with Multiple Modalities

Overview
Journal Nat Commun
Specialty Biology
Date 2018 Dec 22
PMID 30575746
Citations 418
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The creation of genome-wide libraries for CRISPR knockout (CRISPRko), interference (CRISPRi), and activation (CRISPRa) has enabled the systematic interrogation of gene function. Here, we show that our recently-described CRISPRko library (Brunello) is more effective than previously published libraries at distinguishing essential and non-essential genes, providing approximately the same perturbation-level performance improvement over GeCKO libraries as GeCKO provided over RNAi. Additionally, we present genome-wide libraries for CRISPRi (Dolcetto) and CRISPRa (Calabrese), and show in negative selection screens that Dolcetto, with fewer sgRNAs per gene, outperforms existing CRISPRi libraries and achieves comparable performance to CRISPRko in detecting essential genes. We also perform positive selection CRISPRa screens and demonstrate that Calabrese outperforms the SAM approach at identifying vemurafenib resistance genes. We further compare CRISPRa to genome-scale libraries of open reading frames (ORFs). Together, these libraries represent a suite of genome-wide tools to efficiently interrogate gene function with multiple modalities.

Citing Articles

Comprehensive genomic dependency landscape of a human colon cancer organoid.

Khalili S, Mohseninia A, Liu C, Banister C, Heine P, Khazan M Commun Biol. 2025; 8(1):436.

PMID: 40082551 PMC: 11906589. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-07822-5.


A genome wide CRISPR screen reveals novel determinants of long-lived plasma cell secretory capacity.

DSouza L, Young J, Coffman H, Petrow Jr E, Petrow E, Bhattacharya D bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 40060628 PMC: 11888458. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.28.640639.


CRISPR/Cas9 Methods for Identification and Validation of Genes Regulating BCR-Mediated Antigen Uptake.

Berzosa M, McShane A, Nanda P, Williams M, Malinova D Methods Mol Biol. 2025; 2909:153-164.

PMID: 40029521 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4442-3_11.


Leveraging Circular Polymerization and Extension Cloning (CPEC) Method for Construction of CRISPR Screening Libraries.

Dayanc B, Eris S, Senturk S Bio Protoc. 2025; 15(4):e5183.

PMID: 40028016 PMC: 11865837. DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.5183.


PRDM16 controls smooth muscle cell fate in atherosclerosis.

Tan J, Cheng L, Calhoun R, Weller A, Drareni K, Fong S bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 40027729 PMC: 11870537. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.19.639186.


References
1.
Aguirre A, Meyers R, Weir B, Vazquez F, Zhang C, Ben-David U . Genomic Copy Number Dictates a Gene-Independent Cell Response to CRISPR/Cas9 Targeting. Cancer Discov. 2016; 6(8):914-29. PMC: 4972686. DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-16-0154. View

2.
Doench J . Am I ready for CRISPR? A user's guide to genetic screens. Nat Rev Genet. 2017; 19(2):67-80. DOI: 10.1038/nrg.2017.97. View

3.
Pulido-Quetglas C, Aparicio-Prat E, Arnan C, Polidori T, Hermoso T, Palumbo E . Scalable Design of Paired CRISPR Guide RNAs for Genomic Deletion. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017; 13(3):e1005341. PMC: 5333799. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005341. View

4.
Abugessaisa I, Noguchi S, Hasegawa A, Harshbarger J, Kondo A, Lizio M . FANTOM5 CAGE profiles of human and mouse reprocessed for GRCh38 and GRCm38 genome assemblies. Sci Data. 2017; 4:170107. PMC: 5574367. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.107. View

5.
Radzisheuskaya A, Shlyueva D, Muller I, Helin K . Optimizing sgRNA position markedly improves the efficiency of CRISPR/dCas9-mediated transcriptional repression. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016; 44(18):e141. PMC: 5062975. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw583. View