» Articles » PMID: 27159373

Systematic Comparison of CRISPR/Cas9 and RNAi Screens for Essential Genes

Overview
Journal Nat Biotechnol
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2016 May 10
PMID 27159373
Citations 216
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We compared the ability of short hairpin RNA (shRNA) and CRISPR/Cas9 screens to identify essential genes in the human chronic myelogenous leukemia cell line K562. We found that the precision of the two libraries in detecting essential genes was similar and that combining data from both screens improved performance. Notably, results from the two screens showed little correlation, which can be partially explained by the identification of distinct essential biological processes with each technology.

Citing Articles

PRODE recovers essential and context-essential genes through neighborhood-informed scores.

Cantore T, Gasperini P, Bevilacqua R, Ciani Y, Sinha S, Ruppin E Genome Biol. 2025; 26(1):42.

PMID: 40022167 PMC: 11869679. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-025-03501-0.


Decoding heterogeneous single-cell perturbation responses.

Song B, Liu D, Dai W, McMyn N, Wang Q, Yang D Nat Cell Biol. 2025; 27(3):493-504.

PMID: 40011559 PMC: 11906366. DOI: 10.1038/s41556-025-01626-9.


Molecular insights into salt tolerance in Dunaliella tertiolecta involving two betaine aldehyde dehydrogenases.

Zheng Q, Luo J, Wang Q, Chen H, Jiang J World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2024; 41(1):8.

PMID: 39690290 DOI: 10.1007/s11274-024-04217-2.


CRISPR screens and lectin microarrays identify high mannose N-glycan regulators.

Tsui C, Twells N, Durieux J, Doan E, Woo J, Khosrojerdi N Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):9970.

PMID: 39557836 PMC: 11574202. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-53225-1.


Development of compact transcriptional effectors using high-throughput measurements in diverse contexts.

Tycko J, Van M, Aradhana , DelRosso N, Ye H, Yao D Nat Biotechnol. 2024; .

PMID: 39487265 DOI: 10.1038/s41587-024-02442-6.


References
1.
Shalem O, Sanjana N, Zhang F . High-throughput functional genomics using CRISPR-Cas9. Nat Rev Genet. 2015; 16(5):299-311. PMC: 4503232. DOI: 10.1038/nrg3899. View

2.
Bae S, Kweon J, Kim H, Kim J . Microhomology-based choice of Cas9 nuclease target sites. Nat Methods. 2014; 11(7):705-6. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.3015. View

3.
Li W, Xu H, Xiao T, Cong L, Love M, Zhang F . MAGeCK enables robust identification of essential genes from genome-scale CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screens. Genome Biol. 2014; 15(12):554. PMC: 4290824. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-014-0554-4. View

4.
Hart T, Brown K, Sircoulomb F, Rottapel R, Moffat J . Measuring error rates in genomic perturbation screens: gold standards for human functional genomics. Mol Syst Biol. 2014; 10:733. PMC: 4299491. DOI: 10.15252/msb.20145216. View

5.
Zhou Y, Zhu S, Cai C, Yuan P, Li C, Huang Y . High-throughput screening of a CRISPR/Cas9 library for functional genomics in human cells. Nature. 2014; 509(7501):487-91. DOI: 10.1038/nature13166. View