» Articles » PMID: 30530641

Optimizing Genomic Selection for a Sorghum Breeding Program in Haiti: A Simulation Study

Overview
Journal G3 (Bethesda)
Date 2018 Dec 12
PMID 30530641
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Young breeding programs in developing countries, like the Chibas sorghum breeding program in Haiti, face the challenge of increasing genetic gain with limited resources. Implementing genomic selection (GS) could increase genetic gain, but optimization of GS is needed to account for these programs' unique challenges and advantages. Here, we used simulations to identify conditions under which genomic-assisted recurrent selection (GARS) would be more effective than phenotypic recurrent selection (PRS) in small new breeding programs. We compared genetic gain, cost per unit gain, genetic variance, and prediction accuracy of GARS (two or three cycles per year) PRS (one cycle per year) assuming various breeding population sizes and trait genetic architectures. For oligogenic architecture, the maximum relative genetic gain advantage of GARS over PRS was 12-88%, which was observed only during the first few cycles. For the polygenic architecture, GARS provided maximum relative genetic gain advantage of 26-165%, and was always superior to PRS. Average prediction accuracy declines substantially after several cycles of selection, suggesting the prediction models should be updated regularly. Updating prediction models every year increased the genetic gain by up to 33-39% compared to no-update scenarios. For small populations and oligogenic traits, cost per unit gain was lower in PRS than GARS. However, with larger populations and polygenic traits cost per unit gain was up to 67% lower in GARS than PRS. Collectively, the simulations suggest that GARS could increase the genetic gain in small young breeding programs by accelerating the breeding cycles and enabling evaluation of larger populations.

Citing Articles

Optimizing the selection of quantitative traits in plant breeding using simulation.

Vieira R, Nogueira A, Fritsche-Neto R Front Plant Sci. 2025; 16:1495662.

PMID: 39996117 PMC: 11847808. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1495662.


Optimal implementation of genomic selection in clone breeding programs exemplified in potato: II. Effect of selection strategy and cross-selection method on long-term genetic gain.

Wu P, Stich B, Hartje S, Muders K, Prigge V, Van Inghelandt D Plant Genome. 2025; 18(1):e70000.

PMID: 39965909 PMC: 11835509. DOI: 10.1002/tpg2.70000.


Genomic resources, opportunities, and prospects for accelerated improvement of millets.

Kasule F, Diack O, Mbaye M, Kakeeto R, Econopouly B Theor Appl Genet. 2024; 137(12):273.

PMID: 39565376 PMC: 11579216. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-024-04777-9.


Genetic Gain and Inbreeding in Different Simulated Genomic Selection Schemes for Grain Yield and Oil Content in Safflower.

Zhao H, Khansefid M, Lin Z, Hayden M Plants (Basel). 2024; 13(11).

PMID: 38891385 PMC: 11174797. DOI: 10.3390/plants13111577.


Use of simulation to optimize a sweet corn breeding program: implementing genomic selection and doubled haploid technology.

Peixoto M, Coelho I, Leach K, Lubberstedt T, Bhering L, Resende Jr M G3 (Bethesda). 2024; 14(8).

PMID: 38869242 PMC: 11304600. DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkae128.


References
1.
Wong C, Bernardo R . Genomewide selection in oil palm: increasing selection gain per unit time and cost with small populations. Theor Appl Genet. 2008; 116(6):815-24. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-008-0715-5. View

2.
Tester M, Langridge P . Breeding technologies to increase crop production in a changing world. Science. 2010; 327(5967):818-22. DOI: 10.1126/science.1183700. View

3.
Lorenz A . Resource allocation for maximizing prediction accuracy and genetic gain of genomic selection in plant breeding: a simulation experiment. G3 (Bethesda). 2013; 3(3):481-91. PMC: 3583455. DOI: 10.1534/g3.112.004911. View

4.
Habier D, Fernando R, Dekkers J . The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Genetics. 2007; 177(4):2389-97. PMC: 2219482. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.081190. View

5.
Heslot N, Akdemir D, Sorrells M, Jannink J . Integrating environmental covariates and crop modeling into the genomic selection framework to predict genotype by environment interactions. Theor Appl Genet. 2013; 127(2):463-80. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-013-2231-5. View