» Articles » PMID: 20712894

Dynamics of Long-term Genomic Selection

Overview
Journal Genet Sel Evol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Biology
Genetics
Date 2010 Aug 18
PMID 20712894
Citations 91
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Simulation and empirical studies of genomic selection (GS) show accuracies sufficient to generate rapid gains in early selection cycles. Beyond those cycles, allele frequency changes, recombination, and inbreeding make analytical prediction of gain impossible. The impacts of GS on long-term gain should be studied prior to its implementation.

Methods: A simulation case-study of this issue was done for barley, an inbred crop. On the basis of marker data on 192 breeding lines from an elite six-row spring barley program, stochastic simulation was used to explore the effects of large or small initial training populations with heritabilities of 0.2 or 0.5, applying GS before or after phenotyping, and applying additional weight on low-frequency favorable marker alleles. Genomic predictions were from ridge regression or a Bayesian analysis.

Results: Assuming that applying GS prior to phenotyping shortened breeding cycle time by 50%, this practice strongly increased early selection gains but also caused the loss of many favorable QTL alleles, leading to loss of genetic variance, loss of GS accuracy, and a low selection plateau. Placing additional weight on low-frequency favorable marker alleles, however, allowed GS to increase their frequency earlier on, causing an initial increase in genetic variance. This dynamic led to higher long-term gain while mitigating losses in short-term gain. Weighted GS also increased the maintenance of marker polymorphism, ensuring that QTL-marker linkage disequilibrium was higher than in unweighted GS.

Conclusions: Losing favorable alleles that are in weak linkage disequilibrium with markers is perhaps inevitable when using GS. Placing additional weight on low-frequency favorable alleles, however, may reduce the rate of loss of such alleles to below that of phenotypic selection. Applying such weights at the beginning of GS implementation is important.

Citing Articles

Optimal implementation of genomic selection in clone breeding programs exemplified in potato: II. Effect of selection strategy and cross-selection method on long-term genetic gain.

Wu P, Stich B, Hartje S, Muders K, Prigge V, Van Inghelandt D Plant Genome. 2025; 18(1):e70000.

PMID: 39965909 PMC: 11835509. DOI: 10.1002/tpg2.70000.


Changes in allele frequencies and genetic architecture due to selection in two pig populations.

Wientjes Y, Peeters K, Bijma P, Huisman A, Calus M Genet Sel Evol. 2024; 56(1):76.

PMID: 39690415 PMC: 11650847. DOI: 10.1186/s12711-024-00941-3.


SimpleMating: R-package for prediction and optimization of breeding crosses using genomic selection.

Peixoto M, Amadeu R, Bhering L, Ferrao L, Munoz P, Resende Jr M Plant Genome. 2024; 18(1):e20533.

PMID: 39604031 PMC: 11726409. DOI: 10.1002/tpg2.20533.


Leveraging genomic prediction to surpass current yield gains in spring barley.

Astrand J, Odilbekov F, Vetukuri R, Ceplitis A, Chawade A Theor Appl Genet. 2024; 137(12):260.

PMID: 39503804 PMC: 11541387. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-024-04763-1.


Genomic-inferred cross-selection methods for multi-trait improvement in a recurrent selection breeding program.

Atanda S, Bandillo N Plant Methods. 2024; 20(1):133.

PMID: 39218896 PMC: 11367796. DOI: 10.1186/s13007-024-01258-4.


References
1.
Gianola D, de Los Campos G, Hill W, Manfredi E, Fernando R . Additive genetic variability and the Bayesian alphabet. Genetics. 2009; 183(1):347-63. PMC: 2746159. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.109.103952. View

2.
Lorenzana R, Bernardo R . Accuracy of genotypic value predictions for marker-based selection in biparental plant populations. Theor Appl Genet. 2009; 120(1):151-61. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-009-1166-3. View

3.
Habier D, Fernando R, Dekkers J . The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Genetics. 2007; 177(4):2389-97. PMC: 2219482. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.081190. View

4.
Kizilkaya K, Fernando R, Garrick D . Genomic prediction of simulated multibreed and purebred performance using observed fifty thousand single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes. J Anim Sci. 2009; 88(2):544-51. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2009-2064. View

5.
Lande R, Thompson R . Efficiency of marker-assisted selection in the improvement of quantitative traits. Genetics. 1990; 124(3):743-56. PMC: 1203965. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/124.3.743. View