» Articles » PMID: 30510728

Nutritional Composition and Glycemic Index Analyses of Vitamin A-biofortified Maize in Healthy Subjects

Overview
Journal Food Sci Nutr
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2018 Dec 5
PMID 30510728
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Besides being a veritable tool for easing the problem of vitamin A deficiency (VAD), this study sought to explore another potential health benefit of vitamin A-biofortified maize (VABM). In the present study, the nutritional composition and glycemic index (GI) of tuwo masara (a nonfermented maize-based dumpling), made from VABM and the indigenous white maize (IWM) genotype, were evaluated. VABM showed significantly (<0.05) lower fat (4.38 ± 0.46%) and crude protein (6.58 ± 0.13%) but higher crude fiber (5.29 ± 0.0%) contents compared to 5.22 ± 0.25% crude fat, 7.28 ± 0.11% crude protein, and 4.69 ± 0.00% crude fiber in the IWM. The phytic acid content in the IWM (2.77 mg/100 g) was 39% higher than the level (2.0 ± 0.04 mg/100 g) in VABM. The major provitamin A carotenoid in the VABM were lutein (7.37 ± 0.52 μg/g), zeaxanthin (1.65 ± 0.01 μg/g), cryptoxanthin (1.29 ± 0.02 μg/g), and all-trans-β-carotene (0.83 ± 0.02 μg/g), while the IWM contained only lutein (1.52 ± 0.32 μg/g). The total carotene concentration, 12.74 ± 1.13 μg/g dry weight in the VABM, was over eight times higher than that observed for the IWM, 1.52 ± 0.32 μg/g dry weight. The VABM tuwo masara showed a significantly lower GI value (70.3%) compared to the IWM tuwo masara (87.7%). Data obtained from the study further attest to the positive nutritional and health benefits of VABM.

Citing Articles

The potential of utilizing Provitamin A-biofortified maize in producing , a Zimbabwean traditional fermented food.

Chawafambira A, Nyoni Q, Mkungunugwa T Food Sci Nutr. 2021; 9(3):1521-1529.

PMID: 33747466 PMC: 7958571. DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.2125.


Progress in research and applications of cassava flour and starch: a review.

Chisenga S, Workneh T, Bultosa G, Alimi B J Food Sci Technol. 2019; 56(6):2799-2813.

PMID: 31205336 PMC: 6542882. DOI: 10.1007/s13197-019-03814-6.


Improving the Dietary Vitamin A Content of Rural Communities in South Africa by Replacing Non-Biofortified white Maize and Sweet Potato with Biofortified Maize and Sweet Potato in Traditional Dishes.

Govender L, Pillay K, Siwela M, Modi A, Mabhaudhi T Nutrients. 2019; 11(6).

PMID: 31141908 PMC: 6628247. DOI: 10.3390/nu11061198.


Nutritional composition and glycemic index analyses of vitamin A-biofortified maize in healthy subjects.

Oluba O, Oredokun-Lache A Food Sci Nutr. 2018; 6(8):2285-2292.

PMID: 30510728 PMC: 6261220. DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.801.

References
1.
Schulze M, Liu S, Rimm E, Manson J, Willett W, Hu F . Glycemic index, glycemic load, and dietary fiber intake and incidence of type 2 diabetes in younger and middle-aged women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004; 80(2):348-56. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/80.2.348. View

2.
Cheryan M . Phytic acid interactions in food systems. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 1980; 13(4):297-335. DOI: 10.1080/10408398009527293. View

3.
Hanhineva K, Torronen R, Bondia-Pons I, Pekkinen J, Kolehmainen M, Mykkanen H . Impact of dietary polyphenols on carbohydrate metabolism. Int J Mol Sci. 2010; 11(4):1365-402. PMC: 2871121. DOI: 10.3390/ijms11041365. View

4.
Yoon J, Thompson L, Jenkins D . The effect of phytic acid on in vitro rate of starch digestibility and blood glucose response. Am J Clin Nutr. 1983; 38(6):835-42. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/38.6.835. View

5.
Goddard M, Young G, Marcus R . The effect of amylose content on insulin and glucose responses to ingested rice. Am J Clin Nutr. 1984; 39(3):388-92. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/39.3.388. View