» Articles » PMID: 30453772

Continuous Glucose Monitoring Integration in Clinical Practice: A Stepped Guide to Data Review and Interpretation

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2018 Nov 21
PMID 30453772
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The advent of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology has transformed the approach to diabetes care. Multiple CGM systems are commercially available and increased accuracy has allowed development of hybrid and automated insulin delivery systems. Evidence of CGM clinical benefits has also increased exponentially in the last decade.

Methods: Literature search, review of professional guidelines, and consensus statements were used to guide the preparation of this article. The clinical benefits of both professional and personal CGM in clinical practice as well as barriers to wider adotpion were explored. A stepped approach to review and interpretation of CGM data is suggested for use in the clinician's office regardless of the software used.

Results: Although increasing, the use of CGM in patients with diabetes is still not widespread; multiple barriers are still in place, despite the approval of CGM systems for patients above the age of 2 years old, the extension of coverage for Medicare beneficiaries and the integration of CGM with multiple insulin pump systems. Integration of CGM technology in clinical practice presents various challenges, from concerns relative to time constraints during office visits to lack of systematic approach to interpretation of the data.

Conclusions: Understanding the usefulness of personal and professional CGM, appropriate patient selection as well as patient and provider training are crucial for the expansion of CGM therapy use in clinical practice. Utilizing the proposed stepped approach to CGM review and interpretation may allow wider adoption of CGM with more effective and efficient office visits.

Citing Articles

Determinants of implementation of continuous glucose monitoring for patients with Insulin-Treated type 2 diabetes: a national survey of primary care providers.

Vimalananda V, Kragen B, Leibowitz A, Qian S, Wormwood J, Linsky A BMC Prim Care. 2025; 26(1):68.

PMID: 40057678 PMC: 11889852. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-025-02764-7.


Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Diabetes Management During Pregnancy: Evidence, Practical Tips, and Common Pitfalls.

Battarbee A, Durnwald C, Yee L, Valent A Obstet Gynecol. 2024; 144(5):649-659.

PMID: 39016319 PMC: 11486575. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005669.


Augmenting clinicians' analytical workflow through task-based integration of data visualizations and algorithmic insights: a user-centered design study.

Scholich T, Raj S, Lee J, Newman M J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024; 31(11):2455-2473.

PMID: 39003519 PMC: 11491654. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocae183.


Unveiling the interplay between rational, psychological and functional factors in continuous glucose monitoring early adoption: Novel evidence from the Dexcom ONE case in Italy.

Zoccarato F, Manzoni M, Minotti D, Lettieri E, Boaretto A BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):747.

PMID: 38890619 PMC: 11186290. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11195-6.


Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonist Therapy to Achieve Individualized Treatment Goals in Insulin-Treated People With Type 2 Diabetes: A Case Series and Expert Opinion.

Ehrhardt N, Aroda V, Galindo R, Peters A, Shubrook J Clin Diabetes. 2024; 42(2):341-350.

PMID: 38666194 PMC: 11040021. DOI: 10.2337/cd23-0047.


References
1.
Hirsch I . Glycemic variability: it's not just about A1C anymore!. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2005; 7(5):780-3. DOI: 10.1089/dia.2005.7.780. View

2.
Hirsch I . Clinical review: Realistic expectations and practical use of continuous glucose monitoring for the endocrinologist. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009; 94(7):2232-8. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2008-2625. View

3.
Beck R, Tamborlane W, Bergenstal R, Miller K, DuBose S, Hall C . The T1D Exchange clinic registry. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012; 97(12):4383-9. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2012-1561. View

4.
Wong J, Foster N, Maahs D, Raghinaru D, Bergenstal R, Ahmann A . Real-time continuous glucose monitoring among participants in the T1D Exchange clinic registry. Diabetes Care. 2014; 37(10):2702-9. PMC: 4392936. DOI: 10.2337/dc14-0303. View

5.
Kovatchev B, Patek S, Ortiz E, Breton M . Assessing sensor accuracy for non-adjunct use of continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014; 17(3):177-86. PMC: 4346608. DOI: 10.1089/dia.2014.0272. View