» Articles » PMID: 19383778

Clinical Review: Realistic Expectations and Practical Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring for the Endocrinologist

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2009 Apr 23
PMID 19383778
Citations 39
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Context: Real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has been available for type 1 diabetes for several years. This paper is a status report on our early experiences with this next technology.

Evidence Acquisition: The two major sources of data acquisition included PubMed search strategies and personal experience of the author from clinical experience.

Evidence Synthesis: Data assessing CGM accuracy, short-term outcomes (12 wk), and longer term outcomes (6 months) are reported. Potential strategies for successful and efficient use in an office or clinic setting are also discussed. Practical aspects of CGM use (alarm settings, using glycemic trending information) are also reviewed.

Conclusions: Accuracy of this technology has improved in the short amount of time it has been available. Six-month data suggest that patient selection is a key for success. Patients who do not understand or practice the basics of intensive insulin therapy have the greatest challenges. Those who do best watch the receiver frequently, continue with frequent home blood glucose monitoring, use the trending information to make insulin adjustments, and understand the limitations of the technology. With insurance reimbursement improving, CGM is gaining acceptance as an important tool for the management of type 1 diabetes. Like home blood glucose monitoring and insulin pump therapy, this technology by itself is not a panacea for diabetes control. However, it further adds to our ability to improve the lives of people with diabetes. Long-term, the hope is that this technology will pave the way for a "closed-loop" device.

Citing Articles

Investigating the Association Between Family Socioeconomic Profile and Diabetes Control in Children: A Cross-Sectional Study From Sudan.

Hajomer H, Elkhidir O, Mohammed R, Elhassan S, Abdelrahim A, Mohammed Y Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2024; 8(1):e70014.

PMID: 39607902 PMC: 11604174. DOI: 10.1002/edm2.70014.


Cutoff Values for Glycated Albumin, 1,5-Anhydroglucitol, and Fructosamine as Alternative Markers for Hyperglycemia.

Yu H, Park C, Shin K, Woo H, Park H, Sung E J Clin Lab Anal. 2024; 38(19-20):e25097.

PMID: 39405334 PMC: 11520936. DOI: 10.1002/jcla.25097.


Equivalent Electrical Circuit Approach to Enhance a Transducer for Insulin Bioavailability Assessment.

Mancino F, Nouri H, Moccaldi N, Arpaia P, Kanoun O IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2024; 12:533-541.

PMID: 39155919 PMC: 11329217. DOI: 10.1109/JTEHM.2024.3425269.


The Impact of Diabetes Education on Continuous Glucose Monitoring in SUS-Dependent Patients in a Northeastern Brazilian City.

Borges L, Jesus P, Souza J, Silva D, Moura P, Santos R Life (Basel). 2024; 14(3).

PMID: 38541647 PMC: 10971600. DOI: 10.3390/life14030320.


Clinical Implementation of the Omnipod 5 Automated Insulin Delivery System: Key Considerations for Training and Onboarding People With Diabetes.

Berget C, Sherr J, DeSalvo D, Kingman R, Stone S, Brown S Clin Diabetes. 2022; 40(2):168-184.

PMID: 35669307 PMC: 9160549. DOI: 10.2337/cd21-0083.