» Articles » PMID: 30402075

The Evolution of Male Mate Choice and Female Ornamentation: a Review of Mathematical Models

Overview
Journal Curr Zool
Date 2018 Nov 8
PMID 30402075
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The evolution of male preferences and of female ornaments in species with traditional sex roles (i.e., polygyny) have been highlighted as areas in need of more active research by an accumulation of recent findings. The theoretical literature on these topics is relatively small and has centered on the evolution of male choice. Mathematical models have emphasized that, under polygyny, the evolution of male preferences faces much greater competition costs than does the evolution of female preferences. We discuss ways in which costly male choice can nonetheless evolve, via (1) direct selection that favors preferences, primarily through mating with highly fecund females, (2) mechanisms that rely on indirect selection, which weakly counters competitive costs of male preferences, and (3) genetic constraints, primarily in the form of pleiotropy of male and female preferences and traits. We also review a variety of mathematical models that have elucidated how costs to male preferences can be avoided. Finally, we turn our attention to the relatively scant theoretical literature on the effects of male mate choice on the evolution of female traits. We emphasize the finding that the presence of male preferences cannot be assumed to lead to the evolution of female ornaments during polygyny, and point out situations where models have elucidated ways in which female ornaments can nevertheless evolve.

Citing Articles

No geographical differences in male mate choice in a widespread fish, .

Powell C, Schlupp I Behav Ecol. 2024; 35(2):arae008.

PMID: 39371452 PMC: 11453105. DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arae008.


The Genetic Basis Underpinning Sexually Selected Traits across Different Animal Lineages: Are There Genetic Mechanisms in Common?.

Kang J Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(6).

PMID: 38539938 PMC: 10967623. DOI: 10.3390/ani14060841.


Fertility signalling games: should males obey the signal?.

Kovalov V, Kokko H Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023; 378(1876):20210499.

PMID: 36934751 PMC: 10024994. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0499.


Prostaglandin F drives female pheromone signaling in cichlids, revealing a basis for evolutionary divergence in olfactory signaling.

Li C, Lawrence K, Merlo-Coyne J, Juntti S Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022; 120(1):e2214418120.

PMID: 36584295 PMC: 9910499. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2214418120.


Habitat change alters the expression and efficiency of a female ornament.

Backroos S, Ala-Ilomaki L, Candolin U Behav Ecol. 2022; 33(6):1133-1140.

PMID: 36518636 PMC: 9735238. DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arac080.


References
1.
Ptacek M, Travis J . MATE CHOICE IN THE SAILFIN MOLLY, POECILIA LATIPINNA. Evolution. 2017; 51(4):1217-1231. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb03969.x. View

2.
Ihara Y, Aoki K . Sexual selection by male choice in monogamous and polygynous human populations. Theor Popul Biol. 1999; 55(1):77-93. DOI: 10.1006/tpbi.1998.1388. View

3.
Lande R . SEXUAL DIMORPHISM, SEXUAL SELECTION, AND ADAPTATION IN POLYGENIC CHARACTERS. Evolution. 2017; 34(2):292-305. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1980.tb04817.x. View

4.
Servedio M, Dukas R . Effects on population divergence of within-generational learning about prospective mates. Evolution. 2013; 67(8):2363-75. DOI: 10.1111/evo.12127. View

5.
Kopp M, Servedio M, Mendelson T, Safran R, Rodriguez R, Hauber M . Mechanisms of Assortative Mating in Speciation with Gene Flow: Connecting Theory and Empirical Research. Am Nat. 2017; 191(1):1-20. DOI: 10.1086/694889. View