» Articles » PMID: 15801594

Uncoupling the Links Between Male Mating Tactics and Female Attractiveness

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2005 Apr 2
PMID 15801594
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Because not all females are equally attractive, and because mating reduces the chances of getting further copulations, males should prefer better-quality mates. In this paper, we use the Trinidadian guppy (Poecilia reticulata) to explore the effects of two non-correlated measures of female quality--size and reproductive status--on male mating decisions. All male guppies employ two alternative mating tactics. We found that large females, particularly those from a high predation site, were the target of most sneaky mating attempts. The response persisted in fish raised under standard conditions over several generations in the laboratory. In addition, non-pregnant females received more courtship displays. We conclude that males can discriminate among females and that they uncouple their mating tactics to track different axes of quality.

Citing Articles

Male Sexual Preference for Female Swimming Activity in the Guppy ().

Bierbach D, Wenchel R, Gehrig S, Wersing S, OConnor O, Krause J Biology (Basel). 2021; 10(2).

PMID: 33673367 PMC: 7918064. DOI: 10.3390/biology10020147.


The evolution of male mate choice and female ornamentation: a review of mathematical models.

Fitzpatrick C, Servedio M Curr Zool. 2018; 64(3):323-333.

PMID: 30402075 PMC: 6007321. DOI: 10.1093/cz/zoy029.


Female social response to male sexual harassment in poeciliid fish: a comparison of six species.

Dadda M Front Psychol. 2015; 6:1453.

PMID: 26483719 PMC: 4586586. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01453.


Covariation and repeatability of male mating effort and mating preferences in a promiscuous fish.

Godin J, Auld H Ecol Evol. 2013; 3(7):2020-9.

PMID: 23919148 PMC: 3728943. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.607.


Reasons for the invasive success of a guppy (Poecilia reticulata) population in Trinidad.

Sievers C, Willing E, Hoffmann M, Dreyer C, Ramnarine I, Magurran A PLoS One. 2012; 7(5):e38404.

PMID: 22693621 PMC: 3365015. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038404.


References
1.
Knight J . Sexual stereotypes. Nature. 2002; 415(6869):254-6. DOI: 10.1038/415254a. View

2.
Magurran A, Nowak M . Another battle of the sexes: the consequences of sexual asymmetry in mating costs and predation risk in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Proc Biol Sci. 1991; 246(1315):31-8. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1991.0121. View

3.
Reeve J, Fairbairn D . Change in sexual size dimorphism as a correlated response to selection on fecundity. Heredity (Edinb). 2000; 83 ( Pt 6):697-706. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.1999.00616.x. View

4.
Jennions M, Petrie M . Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2000; 75(1):21-64. DOI: 10.1017/s0006323199005423. View

5.
Kraak , Bakker . Mutual mate choice in sticklebacks: attractive males choose big females, which lay big eggs. Anim Behav. 1998; 56(4):859-866. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0822. View