» Articles » PMID: 36518636

Habitat Change Alters the Expression and Efficiency of a Female Ornament

Overview
Journal Behav Ecol
Date 2022 Dec 15
PMID 36518636
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Anthropogenic habitat changes are disrupting the mate choice process in a range of organisms, with consequences for populations and communities. Research has so far focused on male sexually selected traits and female mate choice, given their conspicuousness, whereas effects on female ornaments and male mate choice have been largely overlooked. Yet, females of many species develop ornaments that males use in mate choice. These ornaments can be costly and reduce female fecundity and viability and, hence, influence population growth rate. Thus, attention should be paid to changes in female ornaments and the consequences the changes have for populations. Here, we show that declining visibility in aquatic ecosystems reduces the investment of female three-spined stickleback in a melanin-based ornament in favor of increased mate search activity. The adjustment appears adaptive as males pay less attention to the ornament under poor visibility, and as melanin-based ornaments are generally physiologically costly. It is likely that past fluctuations in visibility have promoted the evolution of environment-dependent plasticity in female ornamentation. More attention should be paid to changes in female ornaments and their adaptive value, across taxa, given the impact that female investment in ornaments can have on fecundity and population growth rate. Environments are changing at an accelerating rate because of human activities and knowledge of the responses of both males and females is needed to evaluate and predict the ultimate impact on populations and biodiversity.

Citing Articles

Habitat change alters the expression and efficiency of a female ornament.

Backroos S, Ala-Ilomaki L, Candolin U Behav Ecol. 2022; 33(6):1133-1140.

PMID: 36518636 PMC: 9735238. DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arac080.

References
1.
Wong B, Candolin U, Lindstrom K . Environmental deterioration compromises socially enforced signals of male quality in three-spined sticklebacks. Am Nat. 2007; 170(2):184-9. DOI: 10.1086/519398. View

2.
Servedio M . Male versus female mate choice: sexual selection and the evolution of species recognition via reinforcement. Evolution. 2007; 61(12):2772-89. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00247.x. View

3.
Kokko H, Brooks R, Jennions M, Morley J . The evolution of mate choice and mating biases. Proc Biol Sci. 2003; 270(1515):653-64. PMC: 1691281. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2235. View

4.
Roulin A . Condition-dependence, pleiotropy and the handicap principle of sexual selection in melanin-based colouration. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2015; 91(2):328-48. DOI: 10.1111/brv.12171. View

5.
LeBas N . Female finery is not for males. Trends Ecol Evol. 2006; 21(4):170-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.01.007. View