» Articles » PMID: 30378177

Development of an Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Formula in Cats

Overview
Date 2018 Nov 1
PMID 30378177
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) formulas are routinely used in human patients to provide a more accurate evaluation of GFR compared to serum creatinine concentration alone. Similar formulas do not exist for cats.

Objectives: To validate a prediction formula for eGFR in cats based on adjusting serum creatinine concentration.

Animals: Client-owned cats with various levels of renal function.

Methods: The study was cross-sectional. Glomerular filtration rate was determined by iohexol clearance. Variables including signalment, biochemical markers, and noninvasive measurements considered to represent surrogate markers of muscle mass were evaluated with the reciprocal of serum creatinine concentration in a multivariable regression model. The derived eGFR formula was subsequently tested in another group of cats and agreement with GFR assessed.

Results: The formula was developed in 55 cats. Only a single morphometric measurement (pelvic circumference) along with the reciprocal of serum creatinine concentration (creatinine ) independently predicted GFR in the final multivariate model. The derived eGFR formula was 0.408 + (243.11 × creatinine [μmol/L]) - (0.014 × pelvic circumference [cm]). When the formula was tested in another 25 cats it was not found to offer any advantage over creatinine alone in its relationship with GFR (eGFR, R  = 0.44, P < .001 vs reciprocal of creatinine, R  = 0.45, P < .001). Furthermore, agreement between eGFR and GFR was poor.

Conclusions And Clinical Importance: An eGFR formula for cats that adjusted serum creatinine concentration for a marker of muscle mass was developed. The formula did not provide a reliable estimate of GFR, and therefore, its routine use cannot be recommended.

Citing Articles

Does intravenous contrast medium administration result in altered renal biomarkers? A study in clinically stable cats with and without azotemia.

Prullage M, Schwendenwein I, Eberspacher-Schweda E, Kneissl S J Feline Med Surg. 2021; 24(6):565-579.

PMID: 34493101 PMC: 11104225. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X211038535.


A Review of Specific Biomarkers of Chronic Renal Injury and Their Potential Application in Nonclinical Safety Assessment Studies.

Obert L, Elmore S, Ennulat D, Frazier K Toxicol Pathol. 2021; 49(5):996-1023.

PMID: 33576319 PMC: 8195817. DOI: 10.1177/0192623320985045.


An artificial neural network-based model to predict chronic kidney disease in aged cats.

Biourge V, Delmotte S, Feugier A, Bradley R, McAllister M, Elliott J J Vet Intern Med. 2020; 34(5):1920-1931.

PMID: 32893924 PMC: 7517863. DOI: 10.1111/jvim.15892.


Development of an estimated glomerular filtration rate formula in cats.

Finch N, Syme H, Elliott J J Vet Intern Med. 2018; 32(6):1970-1976.

PMID: 30378177 PMC: 6271324. DOI: 10.1111/jvim.15325.

References
1.
Bland J, Altman D . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1(8476):307-10. View

2.
Gunn-Moore D, Dodkin S, Sparkes A . An unexpectedly high prevalence of azotaemia in Birman cats. J Feline Med Surg. 2002; 4(3):165-6. PMC: 10822569. DOI: 10.1053/jfms.2002.0175. View

3.
Wang Z, Deurenberg P, Wang W, Pietrobelli A, Baumgartner R, Heymsfield S . Hydration of fat-free body mass: review and critique of a classic body-composition constant. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999; 69(5):833-41. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/69.5.833. View

4.
Levey A, Bosch J, Lewis J, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D . A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med. 1999; 130(6):461-70. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-6-199903160-00002. View

5.
Finch N . Measurement of glomerular filtration rate in cats: methods and advantages over routine markers of renal function. J Feline Med Surg. 2014; 16(9):736-48. PMC: 11185244. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X14545274. View