» Articles » PMID: 30377517

Host Diet Mediates a Negative Relationship Between Abundance and Diversity of Gut Microbiota

Overview
Journal Ecol Evol
Date 2018 Nov 1
PMID 30377517
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Nutrient supply to ecosystems has major effects on ecological diversity, but it is unclear to what degree the shape of this relationship is general versus dependent on the specific environment or community. Although the diet composition in terms of the source or proportions of different nutrient types is known to affect gut microbiota composition, the relationship between the quantity of nutrients supplied and the abundance and diversity of the intestinal microbial community remains to be elucidated. Here, we address this relationship using replicate populations of maintained over multiple generations on three diets differing in the concentration of yeast (the only source of most nutrients). While a 6.5-fold increase in yeast concentration led to a 100-fold increase in the total abundance of gut microbes, it caused a major decrease in their alpha diversity (by 45-60% depending on the diversity measure). This was accompanied by only minor shifts in the taxonomic affiliation of the most common operational taxonomic units (OTUs). Thus, nutrient concentration in host diet mediates a strong negative relationship between the nutrient abundance and microbial diversity in the gut ecosystem.

Citing Articles

Different Long-Term Nutritional Regimens of Shape Its Microbiota and Associated Metabolic Activity in a Sex-Specific Manner.

Jelena R, Jelena T, Marija R, Tanja L, Tatjana S, Bojan B Insects. 2025; 16(2).

PMID: 40003771 PMC: 11856610. DOI: 10.3390/insects16020141.


Microbiome transplants may not improve health and longevity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Levine B, Hoffman J Biol Open. 2025; 14(1).

PMID: 39835966 PMC: 11789278. DOI: 10.1242/bio.061745.


The circadian clock gene period regulates the composition and daily bacterial load of the gut microbiome in Drosophila melanogaster.

Battistolli M, Varponi I, Romoli O, Sandrelli F Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):1016.

PMID: 39762344 PMC: 11704212. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-84455-4.


Effects of Diet on the Gut Bacterial Community of (Diptera: Calliphoridae) across Developmental Stages.

Li Z, Yue C, Ma N, Yan G Insects. 2024; 15(3).

PMID: 38535376 PMC: 10970864. DOI: 10.3390/insects15030181.


Function of Cytochrome P450s and Gut Microbiome in Biopesticide Adaptation of on Different Host Diets.

Liu Y, Yu J, Zhu F, Shen Z, Jiang H, Li Z Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(20).

PMID: 37895115 PMC: 10607806. DOI: 10.3390/ijms242015435.


References
1.
Ridley E, Wong A, Westmiller S, Douglas A . Impact of the resident microbiota on the nutritional phenotype of Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS One. 2012; 7(5):e36765. PMC: 3346728. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036765. View

2.
Storelli G, Defaye A, Erkosar B, Hols P, Royet J, Leulier F . Lactobacillus plantarum promotes Drosophila systemic growth by modulating hormonal signals through TOR-dependent nutrient sensing. Cell Metab. 2011; 14(3):403-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.07.012. View

3.
Goodrich J, Waters J, Poole A, Sutter J, Koren O, Blekhman R . Human genetics shape the gut microbiome. Cell. 2014; 159(4):789-99. PMC: 4255478. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.053. View

4.
Gottar M, Gobert V, Michel T, Belvin M, Duyk G, Hoffmann J . The Drosophila immune response against Gram-negative bacteria is mediated by a peptidoglycan recognition protein. Nature. 2002; 416(6881):640-4. DOI: 10.1038/nature734. View

5.
Bolnick D, Snowberg L, Hirsch P, Lauber C, Knight R, Caporaso J . Individuals' diet diversity influences gut microbial diversity in two freshwater fish (threespine stickleback and Eurasian perch). Ecol Lett. 2014; 17(8):979-87. PMC: 4084827. DOI: 10.1111/ele.12301. View