» Articles » PMID: 3037327

Restriction of P-element Insertions at the Notch Locus of Drosophila Melanogaster

Overview
Journal Mol Cell Biol
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 1987 Apr 1
PMID 3037327
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

P elements move about the Drosophila melanogaster genome in a nonrandom fashion, preferring some chromosomal targets for insertion over others (J. C. J. Eeken, F. H. Sobels, V. Hyland, and A. P. Schalet, Mutat. Res. 150:261-275, 1985; W. R. Engels, Annu. Rev. Genet. 17:315-344, 1983; M. D. Golubovsky, Y. N. Ivanov, and M. M. Green, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74:2973-2975, 1977; M. J. Simmons and J. K. Lim, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77:6042-6046, 1980). Some of this specificity may be due to recognition of a particular DNA sequence in the target DNA; derivatives of an 8-base-pair consensus sequence are occupied by these transposable elements at many different chromosomal locations (K. O'Hare and G. M. Rubin, Cell 34:25-36, 1983). An additional level of specificity of P-element insertions is described in this paper. Of 14 mutations induced in the complex locus Notch by hybrid dysgenesis, 13 involved P-element insertions at or near the transcription start site of the gene. This clustering was not seen in other transposable element-induced mutations of Notch. DNA sequences homologous to the previously described consensus target for P-element insertion are not preferentially located in this region of the locus. The choice of a chromosomal site for integration appears to be based on more subtle variations in chromosome structure that are probably associated with activation or expression of the target gene.

Citing Articles

Expression of a reporter gene resembles that of its neighbour: an insertion in the hairy gene of Drosophila.

Fasano L, Core N, Kerridge S Rouxs Arch Dev Biol. 2017; 197(8):507-512.

PMID: 28305477 DOI: 10.1007/BF00385685.


Raissa L. Berg's contributions to the study of phenotypic integration, with a professional biographical sketch.

Conner J, Lande R Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014; 369(1649):20130250.

PMID: 25002696 PMC: 4084536. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0250.


Hsmar1 transposition is sensitive to the topology of the transposon donor and the target.

Claeys Bouuaert C, Chalmers R PLoS One. 2013; 8(1):e53690.

PMID: 23341977 PMC: 3544897. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053690.


Interactions between enhancer of rudimentary and Notch and deltex reveal a regulatory function of enhancer of rudimentary in the Notch signaling pathway in Drosophila melanogaster.

Tsubota S, Vogel A, Phillips A, Ibach S, Weber N, Kostrzebski M Fly (Austin). 2011; 5(4):275-84.

PMID: 21904119 PMC: 3266069. DOI: 10.4161/fly.5.4.17807.


Removal of the bloom syndrome DNA helicase extends the utility of imprecise transposon excision for making null mutations in Drosophila.

Witsell A, Kane D, Rubin S, McVey M Genetics. 2009; 183(3):1187-93.

PMID: 19687136 PMC: 2778970. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.109.108472.


References
1.
Snyder M, Kimbrell D, Hunkapiller M, Hill R, Fristrom J, Davidson N . A transposable element that splits the promoter region inactivates a Drosophila cuticle protein gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982; 79(23):7430-4. PMC: 347353. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.79.23.7430. View

2.
Kidd S, Lockett T, YOUNG M . The Notch locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Cell. 1983; 34(2):421-33. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90376-8. View

3.
Tsubota S, Ashburner M, Schedl P . P-element-induced control mutations at the r gene of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Cell Biol. 1985; 5(10):2567-74. PMC: 366991. DOI: 10.1128/mcb.5.10.2567-2574.1985. View

4.
Engels W, Preston C . Hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster: the biology of female and male sterility. Genetics. 1979; 92(1):161-74. PMC: 1213938. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/92.1.161. View

5.
Yedvobnick B, Muskavitch M, Wharton K, Halpern M, Paul E, Grimwade B . Molecular genetics of Drosophila neurogenesis. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1985; 50:841-54. DOI: 10.1101/sqb.1985.050.01.102. View