» Articles » PMID: 30355591

CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Homology-directed Repair by SsODNs in Zebrafish Induces Complex Mutational Patterns Resulting from Genomic Integration of Repair-template Fragments

Overview
Journal Dis Model Mech
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2018 Oct 26
PMID 30355591
Citations 47
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Targeted genome editing by CRISPR/Cas9 is extremely well fitted to generate gene disruptions, although precise sequence replacement by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated homology-directed repair (HDR) suffers from low efficiency, impeding its use for high-throughput knock-in disease modeling. In this study, we used next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis to determine the efficiency and reliability of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated HDR using several types of single-stranded oligodeoxynucleotide (ssODN) repair templates for the introduction of disease-relevant point mutations in the zebrafish genome. Our results suggest that HDR rates are strongly determined by repair-template composition, with the most influential factor being homology-arm length. However, we found that repair using ssODNs does not only lead to precise sequence replacement but also induces integration of repair-template fragments at the Cas9 cut site. We observed that error-free repair occurs at a relatively constant rate of 1-4% when using different repair templates, which was sufficient for transmission of point mutations to the F1 generation. On the other hand, erroneous repair mainly accounts for the variability in repair rate between the different repair templates. To further improve error-free HDR rates, elucidating the mechanism behind this erroneous repair is essential. We show that the error-prone nature of ssODN-mediated repair, believed to act via synthesis-dependent strand annealing (SDSA), is most likely due to DNA synthesis errors. In conclusion, caution is warranted when using ssODNs for the generation of knock-in models or for therapeutic applications. We recommend the application of in-depth NGS analysis to examine both the efficiency and error-free nature of HDR events.This article has an associated First Person interview with the first author of the paper.

Citing Articles

Modeling thoracic aortic genetic variants in the zebrafish: useful for predicting clinical pathogenicity?.

Prendergast A, Sheppard M, Famulski J, Nicoli S, Mukherjee S, Sips P Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025; 12:1480407.

PMID: 40066353 PMC: 11892108. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1480407.


Efficient DNA-free co-targeting of nuclear genes in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.

Battarra C, Angstenberger M, Bassi R, DallOsto L Biol Direct. 2024; 19(1):108.

PMID: 39529073 PMC: 11556018. DOI: 10.1186/s13062-024-00545-3.


Pythia: Non-random DNA repair allows predictable CRISPR/Cas9 integration and gene editing.

Naert T, Yamamoto T, Han S, Horn M, Bethge P, Vladimirov N bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39386429 PMC: 11463480. DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.23.614424.


Instantaneous visual genotyping and facile site-specific transgenesis via CRISPR-Cas9 and phiC31 integrase.

Ma J, Zhang W, Rahimialiabadi S, Ganesh N, Sun Z, Parvez S Biol Open. 2024; 13(9).

PMID: 39225039 PMC: 11391820. DOI: 10.1242/bio.061666.


A cis-regulatory element regulates ERAP2 expression through autoimmune disease risk SNPs.

Venema W, Hiddingh S, van Loosdregt J, Bowes J, Balliu B, de Boer J Cell Genom. 2024; 4(1):100460.

PMID: 38190099 PMC: 10794781. DOI: 10.1016/j.xgen.2023.100460.


References
1.
Frank-Vaillant M, Marcand S . Transient stability of DNA ends allows nonhomologous end joining to precede homologous recombination. Mol Cell. 2002; 10(5):1189-99. DOI: 10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00705-0. View

2.
Murphey R, Zon L . Small molecule screening in the zebrafish. Methods. 2006; 39(3):255-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2005.09.019. View

3.
Brandsma I, Gent D . Pathway choice in DNA double strand break repair: observations of a balancing act. Genome Integr. 2012; 3(1):9. PMC: 3557175. DOI: 10.1186/2041-9414-3-9. View

4.
Hoshijima K, Jurynec M, Grunwald D . Precise Editing of the Zebrafish Genome Made Simple and Efficient. Dev Cell. 2016; 36(6):654-67. PMC: 4806538. DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.02.015. View

5.
Ran F, Hsu P, Lin C, Gootenberg J, Konermann S, Trevino A . Double nicking by RNA-guided CRISPR Cas9 for enhanced genome editing specificity. Cell. 2013; 154(6):1380-9. PMC: 3856256. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.021. View