» Articles » PMID: 30306217

Customized Implants for Acetabular Paprosky III Defects May Be Positioned with High Accuracy in Revision Hip Arthroplasty

Overview
Journal Int Orthop
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2018 Oct 12
PMID 30306217
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: In revision hip arthroplasty, custom-made implants are one option in patients with acetabular Paprosky III defects.

Methods: In a retrospective analysis, we identified 11 patients undergoing cup revision using a custom-made implant. The accuracy of the intended position of the implant was assessed on post-operative 3D CT and compared to the pre-operative 3D planning in terms of inclination, anteversion, and centre of rotation. In addition, the accuracy of post-operative plain radiographs for measuring implant position was evaluated in relation to the 3D CT standard.

Results: We found a mean deviation between the planned and the final position of the custom-made acetabular implant on 3D CT of 3.6° ± 2.8° for inclination and of - 1.2° ± 7.0° for anteversion, respectively. Restoration of center of rotation succeeded with an accuracy of 0.3 mm ± 3.9 mm in the mediolateral (x) direction, - 1.1 mm ± 3.8 mm in the anteroposterior (y) direction, and 0.4 mm ± 3.2 mm in the craniocaudal (z) direction. The accuracy of the post-operative plain radiographs in measuring the position of the custom-made implant in relation to 3D CT was 1.1° ± 1.7° for implant inclination, - 2.6° ± 1.3° for anteversion and 1.3 mm ± 3.5 mm in the x-direction, and - 0.9 mm ± 3.8 mm in the z-direction for centre of rotation.

Conclusion: Custom-made acetabular implants can be positioned with good accuracy in Paprosky III defects according to the pre-operative planning. Plain radiographs are adequate for assessing implant position in routine follow-up.

Citing Articles

Custom-Made 3D-Printed Augments and Cages: An Effective Solution for Managing Severe Acetabular Bone Loss.

Annapareddy A, Bose V, Katariya A, Mulpur P, Jayakumar T, Ansari M J Orthop Case Rep. 2025; 15(1):208-214.

PMID: 39801861 PMC: 11723743. DOI: 10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i01.5180.


Does the interface between individual 3D acetabular implants and host bone influence the functional outcomes in patients with severe bone loss after revision surgery?.

Murylev V, Kukovenko G, Efimenko O, Muzychenkov A, Elizarov P, Rudnev A SICOT J. 2024; 10:42.

PMID: 39450974 PMC: 11504249. DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2024040.


Assessment Accuracy of 2D vs. 3D Imaging for Custom-Made Acetabular Implants in Revision Hip Arthroplasty.

Nees T, Mueller C, Innmann M, Spranz D, Westhauser F, Renkawitz T J Pers Med. 2024; 14(8).

PMID: 39202000 PMC: 11355157. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14080808.


High accuracy of positioning custom triflange acetabular components in tumour and total hip arthroplasty revision surgery.

Broekhuis D, Meurs W, Kaptein B, Karunaratne S, Carey Smith R, Sommerville S Bone Jt Open. 2024; 5(4):260-268.

PMID: 38555947 PMC: 10981996. DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.54.BJO-2023-0185.R1.


Personalized digital simulation‑assisted acetabular component implantation in revision hip arthroplasty.

Lao H, Liu D, Cheng B, Liu S, Shuang F, Li H Exp Ther Med. 2024; 27(5):180.

PMID: 38515645 PMC: 10952346. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2024.12468.


References
1.
Volpin A, Konan S, Biz C, Tansey R, Haddad F . Reconstruction of failed acetabular component in the presence of severe acetabular bone loss: a systematic review. Musculoskelet Surg. 2018; 103(1):1-13. DOI: 10.1007/s12306-018-0539-7. View

2.
Paprosky W, Perona P, Lawrence J . Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty. 1994; 9(1):33-44. DOI: 10.1016/0883-5403(94)90135-x. View

3.
Ong K, Mowat F, Chan N, Lau E, Halpern M, Kurtz S . Economic burden of revision hip and knee arthroplasty in Medicare enrollees. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 446:22-8. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000214439.95268.59. View

4.
Audige L, Bhandari M, Kellam J . How reliable are reliability studies of fracture classifications? A systematic review of their methodologies. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004; 75(2):184-94. DOI: 10.1080/00016470412331294445. View

5.
Weber M, Benditz A, Woerner M, Weber D, Grifka J, Renkawitz T . Trainee Surgeons Affect Operative Time but not Outcome in Minimally Invasive Total Hip Arthroplasty. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):6152. PMC: 5522387. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-06530-3. View