» Articles » PMID: 31960168

Acetabular Custom-made Implants for Severe Acetabular Bone Defect in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: a Systematic Review of the Literature

Overview
Date 2020 Jan 22
PMID 31960168
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The management of acetabular bone loss is a challenging problem in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). The aim of this systematic review is to summarize and critically analyze indications, complications, clinical and radiological outcomes of custom-made acetabular components in rTHA.

Methods: A systematic review of English literature was performed on Medline. Retrospective or prospective studies with minimum 2 years of follow-up (FU) were included. The PRISMA 2009 flowchart and checklist were considered to edit the review. Rates of intra- or post-operative complications, aseptic loosening (AL), periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), reoperations and re-revisions rates were extrapolated.

Results: 18 articles with a level of evidence of IV were included. Six hundred and thirty-four acetabular custom components (627 patients) with a mean FU of 58.6 ± 29.8 months were analyzed. The studies showed good clinical and functional outcomes. Custom-made acetabular components allowed a stable fixation with 94.0 ± 5.0% survival rate. The estimated rate of re-operations and re-revisions were 19.3 ± 17.3% and 5.2 ± 4.7%, respectively. The incidence of PJI was 4.0 ± 3.9%.

Conclusions: The acetabular custom-made implants represent a reliable solution for pelvic discontinuity and particular cases of bone loss classified as Paprosky Type IIIA-B or type III-IV according to American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons system where the feature of the defect cannot be handled with standard implants. This strategy allows to fit the implant to the residual host bone, bypassing the bony deficiency and restoring hip biomechanics. Satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes at mid-term follow-up are reported in literature.

Citing Articles

A systematic review of custom 3D-printed acetabular components in revision arthroplasty for the management of extensive acetabular defects.

Koerling A, Singh Grewal U, Stott P J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2025; 62:102869.

PMID: 39917720 PMC: 11795078. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102869.


Does the interface between individual 3D acetabular implants and host bone influence the functional outcomes in patients with severe bone loss after revision surgery?.

Murylev V, Kukovenko G, Efimenko O, Muzychenkov A, Elizarov P, Rudnev A SICOT J. 2024; 10:42.

PMID: 39450974 PMC: 11504249. DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2024040.


Comparison of Bone Graft Preparations to Treat a Critical Bone Defect on a Rodent Animal Model.

Vieira R, Borges R, Tiezzi D, Shimano A, Zamarioli A, Defino H Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2024; 59(4):e532-e541.

PMID: 39239585 PMC: 11374410. DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1788786.


Monoflange custom-made partial pelvis replacements offer a viable solution in extensive Paprosky III defects.

Hanusrichter Y, Gebert C, Steinbeck M, Dudda M, Hardes J, Frieler S Bone Jt Open. 2024; 5(8):688-696.

PMID: 39168473 PMC: 11338660. DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.58.BJO-2024-0029.R1.


Custom-made Trabecular Metal Acetabular Component in Total Hip Revision.

Queiroz R, Fingerhut D, Saito L Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2024; 59(Suppl 1):e78-e82.

PMID: 39027182 PMC: 11254436. DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735142.


References
1.
Cavagnaro L, Formica M, Basso M, Zanirato A, Divano S, Felli L . Femoral revision with primary cementless stems: a systematic review of the literature. Musculoskelet Surg. 2017; 102(1):1-9. DOI: 10.1007/s12306-017-0487-7. View

2.
Burastero G, Basso M, Carrega G, Cavagnaro L, Chiarlone F, Salomone C . Acetabular spacers in 2-stage hip revision: is it worth it? A single-centre retrospective study. Hip Int. 2016; 27(2):187-192. DOI: 10.5301/hipint.5000446. View

3.
Burastero G, Scarfi S, Ferraris C, Fresia C, Sessarego N, Fruscione F . The association of human mesenchymal stem cells with BMP-7 improves bone regeneration of critical-size segmental bone defects in athymic rats. Bone. 2010; 47(1):117-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2010.03.023. View

4.
DeBoer D, Christie M, Brinson M, Morrison J . Revision total hip arthroplasty for pelvic discontinuity. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89(4):835-40. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00313. View

5.
Colen S, Harake R, de Haan J, Mulier M . A modified custom-made triflanged acetabular reconstruction ring (MCTARR) for revision hip arthroplasty with severe acetabular defects. Acta Orthop Belg. 2013; 79(1):71-5. View