» Articles » PMID: 30271337

Classification for Single-Trial N170 During Responding to Facial Picture With Emotion

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2018 Oct 2
PMID 30271337
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Whether an event-related potential (ERP), N170, related to facial recognition was modulated by emotion has always been a controversial issue. Some researchers considered the N170 to be independent of emotion, whereas a recent study has shown the opposite view. In the current study, electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings while responding to facial pictures with emotion were utilized to investigate whether the N170 was modulated by emotion. We found that there was a significant difference between ERP trials with positive and negative emotions of around 170 ms at the occipitotemporal electrodes (i.e., N170). Then, we further proposed the application of the single-trial N170 as a feature for the classification of facial emotion, which could avoid the fact that ERPs were obtained by averaging most of the time while ignoring the trial-to-trial variation. In order to find an optimal classifier for emotional classification with single-trial N170 as a feature, three types of classifiers, namely, linear discriminant analysis (LDA), L1-regularized logistic regression (L1LR), and support vector machine with radial basis function (RBF-SVM), were comparatively investigated. The results showed that the single-trial N170 could be used as a classification feature to successfully distinguish positive emotion from negative emotion. L1-regularized logistic regression classifiers showed a good generalization, whereas LDA showed a relatively poor generalization. Moreover, when compared with L1LR, the RBF-SVM required more time to optimize the parameters during the classification, which became an obstacle while applying it to the online operating system of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). The findings suggested that face-related N170 could be affected by facial expression and that the single-trial N170 could be a biomarker used to monitor the emotional states of subjects for the BCI domain.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of Single-Trial Classification to Control a Visual ERP-BCI under a Situation Awareness Scenario.

Fernandez-Rodriguez A, Ron-Angevin R, Velasco-Alvarez F, Diaz-Pineda J, Letouze T, Andre J Brain Sci. 2023; 13(6).

PMID: 37371365 PMC: 10296700. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13060886.


Stylized faces enhance ERP features used for the detection of emotional responses.

Barradas-Chacon L, Brunner C, Wriessnegger S Front Hum Neurosci. 2023; 17:1160800.

PMID: 37180552 PMC: 10174306. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1160800.


Event-Related Potentials Index Prediction Error Signalling During Perceptual Processing of Emotional Facial Expressions.

Baker K, Johnston P, Yamamoto N, Pegna A Brain Topogr. 2023; 36(3):419-432.

PMID: 36917320 PMC: 10164013. DOI: 10.1007/s10548-023-00951-2.


Comparison of Two Paradigms Based on Stimulation with Images in a Spelling Brain-Computer Interface.

Ron-Angevin R, Fernandez-Rodriguez A, Dupont C, Maigrot J, Meunier J, Tavard H Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(3).

PMID: 36772343 PMC: 9920351. DOI: 10.3390/s23031304.


A novel EEG decoding method for a facial-expression-based BCI system using the combined convolutional neural network and genetic algorithm.

Li R, Liu D, Li Z, Liu J, Zhou J, Liu W Front Neurosci. 2022; 16:988535.

PMID: 36177358 PMC: 9513431. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.988535.


References
1.
Zhang Y, Zhao Q, Jin J, Wang X, Cichocki A . A novel BCI based on ERP components sensitive to configural processing of human faces. J Neural Eng. 2012; 9(2):026018. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/9/2/026018. View

2.
Caharel S, Courtay N, Bernard C, Lalonde R, Rebai M . Familiarity and emotional expression influence an early stage of face processing: an electrophysiological study. Brain Cogn. 2005; 59(1):96-100. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2005.05.005. View

3.
Smith M, Gosselin F, Schyns P . Measuring internal representations from behavioral and brain data. Curr Biol. 2012; 22(3):191-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.11.061. View

4.
Schupp H, Ohman A, Junghofer M, Weike A, Stockburger J, Hamm A . The facilitated processing of threatening faces: an ERP analysis. Emotion. 2004; 4(2):189-200. DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.4.2.189. View

5.
Fazel-Rezai R, Allison B, Guger C, Sellers E, Kleih S, Kubler A . P300 brain computer interface: current challenges and emerging trends. Front Neuroeng. 2012; 5:14. PMC: 3398470. DOI: 10.3389/fneng.2012.00014. View