» Articles » PMID: 34603504

Identification of Food/Nonfood Visual Stimuli from Event-Related Brain Potentials

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2021 Oct 4
PMID 34603504
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although food consumption is one of the most basic human behaviors, the factors underlying nutritional preferences are not yet clear. The use of classification algorithms can clarify the understanding of these factors. This study was aimed at measuring electrophysiological responses to food/nonfood stimuli and applying classification techniques to discriminate the responses using a single-sweep dataset. Twenty-one right-handed male athletes with body mass index (BMI) levels between 18.5% and 25% (mean age: 21.05 ± 2.5) participated in this study voluntarily. The participants were asked to focus on the food and nonfood images that were randomly presented on the monitor without performing any motor task, and EEG data have been collected using a 16-channel amplifier with a sampling rate of 1024 Hz. The SensoMotoric Instruments (SMI) iView XTM RED eye tracking technology was used simultaneously with the EEG to measure the participants' attention to the presented stimuli. Three datasets were generated using the amplitude, time-frequency decomposition, and time-frequency connectivity metrics of P300 and LPP components to separate food and nonfood stimuli. We have implemented -nearest neighbor (kNN), support vector machine (SVM), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Logistic Regression (LR), Bayesian classifier, decision tree (DT), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) classifiers on these datasets. Finally, the response to food-related stimuli in the hunger state is discriminated from nonfood with an accuracy value close to 78% for each dataset. The results obtained in this study motivate us to employ classifier algorithms using the features obtained from single-trial measurements in amplitude and time-frequency space instead of applying more complex ones like connectivity metrics.

Citing Articles

A P300-Detection Method Based on Logistic Regression and a Convolutional Neural Network.

Li Q, Wu Y, Song Y, Zhao D, Sun M, Zhang Z Front Comput Neurosci. 2022; 16:909553.

PMID: 35782086 PMC: 9243506. DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2022.909553.

References
1.
Schupp H, Flaisch T, Stockburger J, Junghofer M . Emotion and attention: event-related brain potential studies. Prog Brain Res. 2006; 156:31-51. DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56002-9. View

2.
Geisler M, Polich J . P300 is unaffected by glucose increase. Biol Psychol. 1994; 37(3):235-45. DOI: 10.1016/0301-0511(94)90005-1. View

3.
Picton T . The P300 wave of the human event-related potential. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1992; 9(4):456-79. DOI: 10.1097/00004691-199210000-00002. View

4.
Karhunen L, Vanninen E, Kuikka J, Lappalainen R, Tiihonen J, Uusitupa M . Regional cerebral blood flow during exposure to food in obese binge eating women. Psychiatry Res. 2000; 99(1):29-42. DOI: 10.1016/s0925-4927(00)00053-6. View

5.
Kopp B, Rist F, Mattler U . N200 in the flanker task as a neurobehavioral tool for investigating executive control. Psychophysiology. 1996; 33(3):282-94. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1996.tb00425.x. View