» Articles » PMID: 36917320

Event-Related Potentials Index Prediction Error Signalling During Perceptual Processing of Emotional Facial Expressions

Overview
Journal Brain Topogr
Specialty Neurology
Date 2023 Mar 14
PMID 36917320
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Humans use socially relevant stimuli to guide perceptual processing of the surrounding environment, with emotional stimuli receiving preferential attention due to their social importance. Predictive coding theory asserts this cognitive process occurs efficiently by combining predictions about what is to be perceived with incoming sensory information, generating prediction errors that are then used to update future predictions. Recent evidence has identified differing neural activity that demonstrates how spatial and feature-based attention may interact with prediction, yet how emotion-guided attention may influence this relationship remains unknown. In the present study, participants viewed a display of two faces in which attention, prediction, and emotion were manipulated, and responded to a face expressing a specific emotion (anger or happiness). The N170 was found to be enhanced by unpredictable as opposed to predictable stimuli, indicating that it indexes general prediction error signalling processes. The N300 amplitudes were also enhanced by unpredictable stimuli, but they were also affected by the attentional status of angry but not happy faces, suggesting that there are differences in prediction error processes indexed by the N170 and N300. Overall, the findings suggest that the N170 and N300 both index violations of expectation for spatial manipulations of stimuli in accordance with prediction error responding processes.

Citing Articles

Comprehensive investigation of predictive processing: A cross- and within-cognitive domains fMRI meta-analytic approach.

Costa C, Pezzetta R, Masina F, Lago S, Gastaldon S, Frangi C Hum Brain Mapp. 2024; 45(12):e26817.

PMID: 39169641 PMC: 11339134. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26817.


Effects of expectation on face perception and its association with expertise.

Mares I, Smith F, Goddard E, Keighery L, Pappasava M, Ewing L Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):9402.

PMID: 38658575 PMC: 11043383. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-59284-0.

References
1.
Auksztulewicz R, Friston K . Attentional Enhancement of Auditory Mismatch Responses: a DCM/MEG Study. Cereb Cortex. 2015; 25(11):4273-83. PMC: 4816780. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhu323. View

2.
Feldmann-Wustefeld T, Schmidt-Daffy M, Schubo A . Neural evidence for the threat detection advantage: differential attention allocation to angry and happy faces. Psychophysiology. 2010; 48(5):697-707. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01130.x. View

3.
Ransom M, Fazelpour S, Markovic J, Kryklywy J, Thompson E, Todd R . Affect-biased attention and predictive processing. Cognition. 2020; 203:104370. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104370. View

4.
Tottenham N, Tanaka J, Leon A, McCarry T, Nurse M, Hare T . The NimStim set of facial expressions: judgments from untrained research participants. Psychiatry Res. 2009; 168(3):242-9. PMC: 3474329. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2008.05.006. View

5.
Feldman H, Friston K . Attention, uncertainty, and free-energy. Front Hum Neurosci. 2010; 4:215. PMC: 3001758. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00215. View