» Articles » PMID: 30247239

Minimal Impact of Implemented Early Warning Score and Best Practice Alert for Patient Deterioration

Overview
Journal Crit Care Med
Date 2018 Sep 25
PMID 30247239
Citations 52
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Previous studies have looked at National Early Warning Score performance in predicting in-hospital deterioration and death, but data are lacking with respect to patient outcomes following implementation of National Early Warning Score. We sought to determine the effectiveness of National Early Warning Score implementation on predicting and preventing patient deterioration in a clinical setting.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Tertiary care academic facility and a community hospital.

Patients: Patients 18 years old or older hospitalized from March 1, 2014, to February 28, 2015, during preimplementation of National Early Warning Score to August 1, 2015, to July 31, 2016, after National Early Warning Score was implemented.

Interventions: Implementation of National Early Warning Score within the electronic health record and associated best practice alert.

Measurements And Main Results: In this study of 85,322 patients (42,402 patients pre-National Early Warning Score and 42,920 patients post-National Early Warning Score implementation), the primary outcome of rate of ICU transfer or death did not change after National Early Warning Score implementation, with adjusted hazard ratio of 0.94 (0.84-1.05) and 0.90 (0.77-1.05) at our academic and community hospital, respectively. In total, 175,357 best practice advisories fired during the study period, with the best practice advisory performing better at the community hospital than the academic at predicting an event within 12 hours 7.4% versus 2.2% of the time, respectively. Retraining National Early Warning Score with newly generated hospital-specific coefficients improved model performance.

Conclusions: At both our academic and community hospital, National Early Warning Score had poor performance characteristics and was generally ignored by frontline nursing staff. As a result, National Early Warning Score implementation had no appreciable impact on defined clinical outcomes. Refitting of the model using site-specific data improved performance and supports validating predictive models on local data.

Citing Articles

Comments on Contemporary Uses of Machine Learning for Electronic Health Records.

Bryan J, Li D N C Med J. 2024; 85(4):263-265.

PMID: 39466097 DOI: 10.18043/001c.120570.


Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model for Prediction of Adult Physiological Deterioration.

Shashikumar S, Le J, Yung N, Ford J, Singh K, Malhotra A Crit Care Explor. 2024; 6(9):e1151.

PMID: 39258951 PMC: 11392495. DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001151.


Intensive care unit admission criteria: a scoping review.

Soares J, Leung C, Campbell V, Van Der Vegt A, Malycha J, Andersen C J Intensive Care Soc. 2024; 25(3):296-307.

PMID: 39224425 PMC: 11366187. DOI: 10.1177/17511437241246901.


Prioritising deteriorating patients using time-to-event analysis: prediction model development and internal-external validation.

Blythe R, Parsons R, Barnett A, Cook D, McPhail S, White N Crit Care. 2024; 28(1):247.

PMID: 39020419 PMC: 11256441. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-05021-y.


Explainable Deep Learning Model for Predicting Serious Adverse Events in Hospitalized Geriatric Patients Within 72 Hours.

Hsu T, Cheng C, Chiu I, Lin C, Cheng F, Pan H Clin Interv Aging. 2024; 19:1051-1063.

PMID: 38883992 PMC: 11180436. DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S460562.


References
1.
Smith G, Prytherch D, Meredith P, Schmidt P, Featherstone P . The ability of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) to discriminate patients at risk of early cardiac arrest, unanticipated intensive care unit admission, and death. Resuscitation. 2013; 84(4):465-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.12.016. View

2.
Liu V, Kipnis P, Rizk N, Escobar G . Adverse outcomes associated with delayed intensive care unit transfers in an integrated healthcare system. J Hosp Med. 2011; 7(3):224-30. DOI: 10.1002/jhm.964. View

3.
Mendez C, Harrington D, Christenson P, Spellberg B . Impact of hospital variables on case mix index as a marker of disease severity. Popul Health Manag. 2013; 17(1):28-34. PMC: 3931432. DOI: 10.1089/pop.2013.0002. View

4.
Embi P, Leonard A . Evaluating alert fatigue over time to EHR-based clinical trial alerts: findings from a randomized controlled study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012; 19(e1):e145-8. PMC: 3392862. DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000743. View

5.
Goldstein B, Navar A, Pencina M, Ioannidis J . Opportunities and challenges in developing risk prediction models with electronic health records data: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016; 24(1):198-208. PMC: 5201180. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocw042. View