» Articles » PMID: 12161291

The Identification of Risk Factors for Cardiac Arrest and Formulation of Activation Criteria to Alert a Medical Emergency Team

Overview
Journal Resuscitation
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 2002 Aug 6
PMID 12161291
Citations 73
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: (1) To identify risk factors for in-hospital cardiac arrest; (2) to formulate activation criteria to alert a clinical response culminating in attendance by a Medical Emergency Team (MET); (3) to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the scoring system.

Methods: Quasi-experimental design to determine prevalence of risk factors for cardiac arrest in the hospitalised population. Weighting of risk factors and formulation of activation criteria to alert a graded clinical response. ROC analysis of weighted cumulative scores to determine their sensitivity and specificity.

Setting: An acute 700 bed district general hospital with 32,348 adult admissions in 1999 and a catchment population of around 365,000.

Subjects: 118 consecutive adult patients suffering primary cardiac arrest in-hospital and 132 non-arrest patients, randomly selected according to stratified randomisation by gender and age.

Results: Risk factors for cardiac arrest include: abnormal respiratory rate (P = 0.013), abnormal breathing indicator (abnormal rate or documented shortness of breath) (P < 0.001), abnormal pulse (P < 0.001), reduced systolic blood pressure (P < 0.001), abnormal temperature (P < 0.001), reduced pulse oximetry (P < 0.001), chest pain (P < 0.001) and nurse or doctor concern (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis of cardiac arrest cases identified three positive associations for cardiac arrest: abnormal breathing indicator (OR 3.49; 95% CI: 1.69-7.21), abnormal pulse (OR 4.07; 95% CI: 2.0-8.31) and abnormal systolic blood pressure (OR 19.92; 95% CI: 9.48-41.84). Risk factors were weighted and tabulated. The aggregate score determines the grade of clinical response. ROC analysis determined that a score of 4 has 89% sensitivity and 77% specificity for cardiac arrest; a score of 8 has 52% sensitivity and 99% specificity. All patients scoring greater than 10 suffered cardiac arrest.

Conclusion: Risk factors for cardiac arrest have been identified, quantified and formulated into a table of activation criteria to help predict and avert cardiac arrest by alerting a clinical response. A graded clinical response has resulted in a tool that has both sensitivity and specificity for cardiac arrest.

Citing Articles

[Deep Learning Reconstruction Algorithm Combined With Smart Metal Artifact Reduction Technique Improves Image Quality of Upper Abdominal CT in Critically Ill Patients].

Pan Y, Yao X, Gao R, Xie W, Xia C, Li Z Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2025; 55(6):1403-1409.

PMID: 39990832 PMC: 11839371. DOI: 10.12182/20241160102.


Community-Acquired Pneumonia in the Immunocompromised Patients: An Observational Study from a Single Center, TURKEY.

Yilmaz E, Benli A, Basaran S, Simsek-Yavuz S, Cagatay A, Oncul M Infect Drug Resist. 2024; 17:4875-4885.

PMID: 39524981 PMC: 11550708. DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S480520.


Heart/breathing rate ratio (HBR) as a predictor of mortality in critically ill patients.

Zhang T, Du Y, Hou Y, Du Q, Dou H, Gao X Heliyon. 2024; 10(10):e31187.

PMID: 38803872 PMC: 11128922. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31187.


CARDS, a Novel Prognostic Index for Risk Stratification and In-Hospital Monitoring.

Liang S, Chang Q, Zhang Y, Du H, Zhu H, Chen S J Clin Med. 2024; 13(7).

PMID: 38610725 PMC: 11012846. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13071961.


Cardiorespiratory Sensors and Their Implications for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Detection: A Systematic Review.

Lingawi S, Hutton J, Khalili M, Shadgan B, Christenson J, Grunau B Ann Biomed Eng. 2024; 52(5):1136-1158.

PMID: 38358559 DOI: 10.1007/s10439-024-03442-y.