» Articles » PMID: 23318488

ICU Admittance by a Rapid Response Team Versus Conventional Admittance, Characteristics, and Outcome

Overview
Journal Crit Care Med
Date 2013 Jan 16
PMID 23318488
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate characteristics and outcome of ICU patients admitted from general wards based on mode of admittance, via a rapid response team or conventional contact.

Design: Observational prospective study.

Setting: General ICU of a university hospital.

Patients: : A total of 694 admissions to ICU from general wards.

Interventions: None.

Measurements And Main Results: Between 2007 and 2009, two cohorts admitted to ICU from general wards were identified: those admitted by the rapid response team and those admitted in a conventional way. Patients admitted directly from the trauma room, the emergency department, operating room, other hospitals, or other ICUs were excluded. Of 694 admissions, 355 came through a rapid response team call. Rapid response team patients were older (p < 0.01), and they had more severe comorbidities, higher severity score (p < 0.01), and almost three times more often the diagnosis of severe sepsis (p < 0.01) than conventionally admitted patients. Rapid response team patients had higher ICU mortality and 30-day mortality with a crude odds ratio for mortality within 30 days of 1.57 (95% confidence interval 1.08-2.28). Adjusted for age and comorbidities however, the difference was no longer significant with an odds ratio of 1.11 (95% confidence interval 0.70-1.76).

Conclusions: This study suggests that the rapid response team is an important system for identifying complex patients in need of intensive care. More than half of ICU admissions from the wards came through a rapid response team call. Compared with conventional admissions, rapid response team patients had a high proportion of characteristics that could be related to a worse prognosis. Severe sepsis at the wards was mainly detected by the rapid response team and was the most common admitting diagnosis among the rapid response team patients. When adjusted for confounding factors, outcome between the groups did not differ, supporting the use of rapid response systems to identify deteriorating ward patients.

Citing Articles

Acute respiratory distress syndrome due to COVID-19. Clinical and prognostic features from a medical Critical Care Unit in Valencia, Spain.

Ramirez P, Gordon M, Martin-Cerezuela M, Villarreal E, Sancho E, Padros M Med Intensiva. 2024; 45(1):27-34.

PMID: 38620897 PMC: 7836701. DOI: 10.1016/j.medin.2020.06.015.


Intensive care admissions following rapid response team reviews in patients with COVID-19 in Australia.

Johnston C, Subramaniam A, Orosz J, Burrell A, Serpa Neto A, Young M Crit Care Resusc. 2023; 24(2):106-115.

PMID: 38045596 PMC: 10692595. DOI: 10.51893/2022.2.OA1.


Refusal of beds and triage of patients admitted to intensive care units in Brazil: a cross-sectional national survey.

Lepre R, Mezzaroba A, Queiroz Cardoso L, Matsuo T, Grion C Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2023; 34(4):484-491.

PMID: 36888829 PMC: 9987007. DOI: 10.5935/0103-507X.20220264-pt.


Outcome prediction for patients assessed by the medical emergency team: a retrospective cohort study.

Adielsson A, Danielsson C, Forkman P, Karlsson T, Pettersson L, Herlitz J BMC Emerg Med. 2022; 22(1):200.

PMID: 36494620 PMC: 9733206. DOI: 10.1186/s12873-022-00739-w.


Early warning systems and rapid response systems for the prevention of patient deterioration on acute adult hospital wards.

McGaughey J, Fergusson D, Van Bogaert P, Rose L Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021; 11:CD005529.

PMID: 34808700 PMC: 8608437. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005529.pub3.