» Articles » PMID: 30229537

Direct-to-consumer Carrier Screening for Cystic Fibrosis Via a Hospital Website: a 6-year Evaluation

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Health Services
Date 2018 Sep 20
PMID 30229537
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A Dutch university hospital started offering cystic fibrosis (CF) carrier screening directly to consumers (DTC) through their website in 2010. A 6-year process evaluation was conducted to evaluate the offer. Screening was implemented as intended. However, uptake was lower than expected. Forty-four tests have been requested, partly by couples with a positive family history for CF, which was not the intended target group. Users were generally positive about the screening offer, citing accessibility, ease of testing, anonymity, and perceived shortcomings of regular healthcare as reasons for requesting screening. DTC CF carrier screening via a university hospital website is feasible, but is seldom used. Considering technological advances, continuation of this specific offer is questionable.

Citing Articles

Carrier Screening Programs for Cystic Fibrosis, Fragile X Syndrome, Hemoglobinopathies and Thalassemia, and Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A Health Technology Assessment.

Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2023; 23(4):1-398.

PMID: 37637488 PMC: 10453298.


Incorporating patient perspectives in the development of a core outcome set for reproductive genetic carrier screening: a sequential systematic review.

Richardson E, McEwen A, Newton-John T, Crook A, Jacobs C Eur J Hum Genet. 2022; 30(7):756-765.

PMID: 35347269 PMC: 9259674. DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01090-1.


Couples' experiences with expanded carrier screening: evaluation of a university hospital screening offer.

van Dijke I, Lakeman P, Sabiri N, Rusticus H, Ottenheim C, Mathijssen I Eur J Hum Genet. 2021; 29(8):1252-1258.

PMID: 34155360 PMC: 8384865. DOI: 10.1038/s41431-021-00923-9.

References
1.
Hulscher M, Laurant M, Grol R . Process evaluation on quality improvement interventions. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003; 12(1):40-6. PMC: 1743654. DOI: 10.1136/qhc.12.1.40. View

2.
Henneman L, Bramsen I, van Kempen L, van Acker M, Pals G, van der Horst H . Offering preconceptional cystic fibrosis carrier couple screening in the absence of established preconceptional care services. Community Genet. 2003; 6(1):5-13. DOI: 10.1159/000069540. View

3.
Saunders R, Evans M, Joshi P . Developing a process-evaluation plan for assessing health promotion program implementation: a how-to guide. Health Promot Pract. 2005; 6(2):134-47. DOI: 10.1177/1524839904273387. View

4.
McClaren B, Delatycki M, Collins V, Metcalfe S, Aitken M . 'It is not in my world': an exploration of attitudes and influences associated with cystic fibrosis carrier screening. Eur J Hum Genet. 2007; 16(4):435-44. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201965. View

5.
Lakeman P, Plass A, Henneman L, Bezemer P, Cornel M, Ten Kate L . Three-month follow-up of Western and non-Western participants in a study on preconceptional ancestry-based carrier couple screening for cystic fibrosis and hemoglobinopathies in the Netherlands. Genet Med. 2008; 10(11):820-30. DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e318188d04c. View