» Articles » PMID: 12748433

Offering Preconceptional Cystic Fibrosis Carrier Couple Screening in the Absence of Established Preconceptional Care Services

Overview
Journal Community Genet
Publisher Karger
Specialty Health Services
Date 2003 May 16
PMID 12748433
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To investigate the feasibility and acceptability of different modes of offering preconceptional carrier screening for cystic fibrosis (CF) in the absence of established preconceptional care services.

Methods: Individuals aged 20-35 years were invited by mail, either by the Municipal Health Services (MHS) or by their own general practitioner (GP) to participate in a screening program with their partner. Pretest education was provided either during a group educational session or during a GP consultation. The reasons given by participants and nonrespondents for (not) responding to the invitation for screening, sociodemographic characteristics, and their attitudes were assessed by means of questionnaires.

Results: Of 38,114 individuals who received a first invitation, approximately 20% had a partner with whom they were planning to have children. The response rate, as measured by attendance at either a group educational session or a GP consultation, was not affected by whether the letter was sent by the MHS or the person's GP. However, the response rate was about 2.5 times higher when the letter invited people to make an appointment with their GP for a consultation regarding CF carrier screening than when it invited them to attend an educational group session. A total of 559 couples (96%) consented to have the test after education. Repetition of the invitation increased the response. The main reason given by couples for not responding was "lack of time to attend" or "forgot about it" (48%). Another reason given was that they did not want to know their test results (28%). Eighty-nine percent of participants and 69% of nonrespondents believed that screening should be offered routinely to couples planning to have children. The GPs consulted (n = 18) reported no negative experiences, but due to the extra workload, 11 of them would not consider it to be part of their task.

Conclusions: Among couples planning to have children, there is generally a positive attitude towards routinely offering population-based CF carrier screening. Preconceptional CF carrier screening appeared feasible, both in terms of practical achievements and target group accessibility. Participation varied according to the pretest education setting, with the primary care setting producing the highest rate of attendance.

Citing Articles

Women's preferences for genetic screening in routine care: A qualitative study.

Madeo A, Kohlmann W, Liao Y, Zhong L, Rothwell E, Kaphingst K Patient Educ Couns. 2024; 130:108439.

PMID: 39303503 PMC: 11611628. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108439.


Primary care professionals' views on population-based expanded carrier screening: an online focus group study.

van den Heuvel L, Woudstra A, van der Hout S, Jans S, Wiersma T, Dondorp W Fam Pract. 2023; 41(4):571-578.

PMID: 36722294 PMC: 11324326. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmad011.


Preconception risk assessment for thalassaemia, sickle cell disease, cystic fibrosis and Tay-Sachs disease.

Hussein N, Henneman L, Kai J, Qureshi N Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021; 10:CD010849.

PMID: 34634131 PMC: 8504980. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010849.pub4.


GP-provided couple-based expanded preconception carrier screening in the Dutch general population: who accepts the test-offer and why?.

Schuurmans J, Birnie E, Ranchor A, Abbott K, Fenwick A, Lucassen A Eur J Hum Genet. 2019; 28(2):182-192.

PMID: 31570785 PMC: 6974594. DOI: 10.1038/s41431-019-0516-0.


Feasibility of couple-based expanded carrier screening offered by general practitioners.

Schuurmans J, Birnie E, van den Heuvel L, Plantinga M, Lucassen A, van der Kolk D Eur J Hum Genet. 2019; 27(5):691-700.

PMID: 30742054 PMC: 6462008. DOI: 10.1038/s41431-019-0351-3.