» Articles » PMID: 12571344

Process Evaluation on Quality Improvement Interventions

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2003 Feb 7
PMID 12571344
Citations 135
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To design potentially successful quality improvement (QI) interventions, it is crucial to make use of detailed breakdowns of the implementation processes of successful and unsuccessful interventions. Process evaluation can throw light on the mechanisms responsible for the result obtained in the intervention group. It enables researchers and implementers to (1). describe the intervention in detail, (2). check actual exposure to the intervention, and (3). describe the experience of those exposed. This paper presents a framework containing features of QI interventions that might influence success. Attention is paid to features of the target group, the implementers or change agents, the frequency of intervention activities, and features of the information imparted. The framework can be used as a starting point to address all three aspects of process evaluation mentioned above. Process evaluation can be applied to small scale improvement projects, controlled QI studies, and large scale QI programmes; in each case it plays a different role.

Citing Articles

Care bundles to improve enteral nutrition management in stroke patients: study protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial.

Wang C, Liu S, Jia S, Yan C, Zhang X, Liu Y Trials. 2024; 25(1):795.

PMID: 39587615 PMC: 11587749. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08645-1.


Process evaluation of a data-driven quality improvement program within a cluster randomised controlled trial to improve coronary heart disease management in Australian primary care.

Hafiz N, Hyun K, Tu Q, Knight A, Hespe C, Chow C PLoS One. 2024; 19(6):e0298777.

PMID: 38833486 PMC: 11149853. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298777.


Strengthening respectful communication with patients and colleagues in neonatal units - developing and evaluating a communication and emotional competence training for nurse managers in Kenya.

Musitia P, Boga M, Oluoch D, Haaland A, Nzinga J, English M Wellcome Open Res. 2024; 7:223.

PMID: 38708375 PMC: 11066535. DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18006.1.


Implementing a new living concept for persons with dementia in long-term care: evaluation of a quality improvement process.

Portegijs S, van Beek A, Huibertina Davida van Tuyl L, Wagner C BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):306.

PMID: 38454437 PMC: 10921681. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10765-y.


Online remote behavioural intervention for tics in 9- to 17-year-olds: the ORBIT RCT with embedded process and economic evaluation.

Hollis C, Hall C, Khan K, Le Novere M, Marston L, Jones R Health Technol Assess. 2023; 27(18):1-120.

PMID: 37924247 PMC: 10641713. DOI: 10.3310/CPMS3211.


References
1.
Hermens R, Hak E, Hulscher M, Braspenning J, Grol R . Adherence to guidelines on cervical cancer screening in general practice: programme elements of successful implementation. Br J Gen Pract. 2002; 51(472):897-903. PMC: 1314146. View

2.
Pope C, Van Royen P, Baker R . Qualitative methods in research on healthcare quality. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002; 11(2):148-52. PMC: 1743608. DOI: 10.1136/qhc.11.2.148. View

3.
Nattinger A, Panzer R, Janus J . Improving the utilization of screening mammography in primary care practices. Arch Intern Med. 1989; 149(9):2087-92. View

4.
Baskerville N, Hogg W, Lemelin J . Process evaluation of a tailored multifaceted approach to changing family physician practice patterns improving preventive care. J Fam Pract. 2001; 50(3):W242-9. View

5.
Grol R . Personal paper. Beliefs and evidence in changing clinical practice. BMJ. 1997; 315(7105):418-21. PMC: 2127297. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.315.7105.418. View