Flower Preferences and Pollen Transport Networks for Cavity-nesting Solitary Bees: Implications for the Design of Agri-environment Schemes
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Floral foraging resources are valuable for pollinator conservation on farmland, and their provision is encouraged by agri-environment schemes in many countries. Across Europe, wildflower seed mixtures are widely sown on farmland to encourage pollinators, but the extent to which key pollinator groups such as solitary bees exploit and benefit from these resources is unclear. We used high-throughput sequencing of 164 pollen samples extracted from the brood cells of six common cavity-nesting solitary bee species (, , , , and ) which are widely distributed across the UK and Europe. We documented their pollen use across 19 farms in southern England, UK, revealing their forage plants and examining the structure of their pollen transport networks. Of the 32 plant species included currently in sown wildflower mixes, 15 were recorded as present within close foraging range of the bees on the study farms, but only L. was identified within the pollen samples. L. was the most commonly found of the 23 plant species identified in the pollen samples, suggesting that, in addition to providing a nesting resource for leafcutter bees, it may be an important forage plant for these species. Higher levels of connectance and nestedness were characteristic of pollen transport networks on farms with abundant floral resources, which may increase resilience to species loss. Our data suggest that plant species promoted currently by agri-environment schemes are not optimal for solitary bee foraging. If a diverse community of pollinators is to be supported on UK and European farmland, additional species such as should be encouraged to meet the foraging requirements of solitary bees.
Identification of potential insect ecological interactions using a metabarcoding approach.
Borsato N, Lunn K, Garrett N, Biganzoli-Rangel A, Marquina D, Steinke D PeerJ. 2025; 13:e18906.
PMID: 39981046 PMC: 11841592. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18906.
Yang G, Zhou Q, Yang J, Chen G, Niu Z, Orr M Sci Data. 2025; 12(1):46.
PMID: 39794368 PMC: 11724062. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-025-04385-2.
The genome sequence of the wood-carving leafcutter bee, (Kirby, 1802).
Crowley L, Falk S Wellcome Open Res. 2024; 9:103.
PMID: 38903870 PMC: 11187525. DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.21002.1.
Flower-bee versus pollen-bee metanetworks in fragmented landscapes.
Libran-Embid F, Grass I, Emer C, Alarcon-Segura V, Behling H, Biagioni S Proc Biol Sci. 2024; 291(2023):20232604.
PMID: 38807521 PMC: 11338570. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2023.2604.
Seasonal and elevational changes of plant-pollinator interaction networks in East African mountains.
Dzekashu F, Pirk C, Yusuf A, Classen A, Kiatoko N, Steffan-Dewenter I Ecol Evol. 2023; 13(5):e10060.
PMID: 37187966 PMC: 10175727. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10060.