» Articles » PMID: 30011870

Clinical Assessment of Dental Implant Stability During Follow-Up: What Is Actually Measured, and Perspectives

Overview
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2018 Jul 18
PMID 30011870
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The optimization of loading protocols following dental implant insertion requires setting up patient-specific protocols, customized according to the actual implant osseointegration, measured through quantitative, objective methods. Various devices for the assessment of implant stability as an indirect measure of implant osseointegration have been developed. They are analyzed here, introducing the respective physical models, outlining major advantages and critical aspects, and reporting their clinical performance. A careful discussion of underlying hypotheses is finally reported, as is a suggestion for further development of instrumentation and signal analysis.

Citing Articles

Bone graft substitutes and dental implant stability in immediate implant surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Vanka S, Abul Kasem F, Kailani T, Wali O, Vanka A Evid Based Dent. 2024; .

PMID: 39528756 DOI: 10.1038/s41432-024-01077-5.


An Instrumented Hammer to Detect the Rupture of the Pterygoid Plates.

Bas Dit Nugues M, Lamassoure L, Rosi G, Flouzat-Lachaniette C, Khonsari R, Haiat G Ann Biomed Eng. 2024; 53(1):59-70.

PMID: 39174762 PMC: 11782435. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-024-03596-9.


Correlation Between Implant Stability Quotient and Percussion Sound Frequency.

Peeraprasompong W, Aunmeungtong W, Khongkhunthian P Clin Exp Dent Res. 2024; 10(4):e917.

PMID: 38973208 PMC: 11228351. DOI: 10.1002/cre2.917.


Influencing factors and evaluation methods for early stability of immediate implant.

Shao W, Zhang D Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024; 49(2):305-311.

PMID: 38755727 PMC: 11103061. DOI: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2024.230244.


Influence of implant length and insertion depth on primary stability of short dental implants: An in vitro study of a novel mandibular artificial bone model.

Wu H, Huang H, Fuh L, Tsai M, Hsu J J Dent Sci. 2024; 19(1):139-147.

PMID: 38303865 PMC: 10829676. DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2023.05.019.


References
1.
Zanetti E, Ciaramella S, Cali M, Pascoletti G, Martorelli M, Asero R . Modal analysis for implant stability assessment: Sensitivity of this methodology for different implant designs. Dent Mater. 2018; 34(8):1235-1245. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.05.016. View

2.
Cesaretti G, Lang N, Vigano P, Bengazi F, Apaza Alccayhuaman K, Botticelli D . Immediate and delayed loading of fixed dental prostheses supported by single or two splinted implants: A histomorphometric study in dogs. J Oral Rehabil. 2018; 45(4):308-316. DOI: 10.1111/joor.12612. View

3.
Salvi G, Lang N . Diagnostic parameters for monitoring peri-implant conditions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005; 19 Suppl:116-27. View

4.
Aparicio C, Lang N, Rangert B . Validity and clinical significance of biomechanical testing of implant/bone interface. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006; 17 Suppl 2:2-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01365.x. View

5.
Sewerin I . Errors in radiographic assessment of marginal bone height around osseointegrated implants. Scand J Dent Res. 1990; 98(5):428-33. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1990.tb00994.x. View