» Articles » PMID: 29998288

Use of Video Review to Investigate Technical Factors That May Be Associated With Delayed Gastric Emptying After Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Overview
Journal JAMA Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2018 Jul 13
PMID 29998288
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Importance: Technical proficiency at robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) and video assessment are promising tools for understanding postoperative outcomes. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) remains a major driver of cost and morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Objective: To determine if technical variables during RPD are associated with postoperative DGE.

Design, Setting, And Participants: A retrospective study was conducted of technical assessment performed in all available videos (n = 192) of consecutive RPDs performed at a single academic institution from October 3, 2008, through September 27, 2016.

Exposures: Video review of gastrojejunal anastomosis during RPD.

Main Outcomes And Measures: Delayed gastric emptying was classified according to International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery criteria. Video analysis reviewed technical variables specific in the construction of the gastrojejunal anastomosis. Using multivariate analysis, DGE was correlated with known patient variables and technical variables, individually and combined.

Results: Of 410 RPDs performed, video was available for 192 RPDs (80 women and 112 men; mean [SD] age, 65.7 [11.1] years). Delayed gastric emptying occurred in 41 patients (21.4%; grade A, 15; grade B, 14; and grade C, 12). Patient variables contributing to DGE on multivariate analysis were advanced age (odds ratio [OR] 1.11; 95% CI, 1.05-1.16; P < .001), small pancreatic duct size (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.72-0.98; P = .03), and postoperative pseudoaneurysm (OR, 17.29; 95% CI, 2.34-127.78; P = .005). However, technical variables contributing to decreased DGE on multivariate analysis included the flow angle (within 30° of vertical) between the stomach and efferent jejunal limb (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.08-0.79; P = .02), greater length of the gastrojejunal anastomosis (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.20-0.77; P = .006), and a robotic-sewn anastomosis (robotic suture vs stapler: OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.09-0.95; P = .04).

Conclusions And Relevance: This study examines modifiable technical factors through the use of review of video obtained at the time of operation and suggests ways by which the surgical construction of the gastrojejunal anastomosis during RPD may reduce the incidence of DGE as a framework for prospective quality improvement.

Citing Articles

Feasibility and outcomes of robotic partial pancreatoduodenectomy.

Rouault A, Richa Y, El Amrani M Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2024; 13(4):669-671.

PMID: 39175737 PMC: 11336533. DOI: 10.21037/hbsn-24-288.


Employing Advanced Technology to Reduce Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula.

Boone B Ann Surg Open. 2024; 5(1):e373.

PMID: 38883937 PMC: 11175965. DOI: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000373.


The development of a deep learning model for automated segmentation of the robotic pancreaticojejunostomy.

Al Abbas A, Namazi B, Radi I, Alterio R, Abreu A, Rail B Surg Endosc. 2024; 38(5):2553-2561.

PMID: 38488870 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10725-x.


Role of minimally invasive surgery in the management of localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a review.

Kakati R, Naffouje S, Spanheimer P, Dahdaleh F J Robot Surg. 2024; 18(1):85.

PMID: 38386224 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01825-w.


Risk factors of delayed gastric emptying in patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.

Dai S, Peng Y, Wang G, Yin L, Yan H, Xi C Int J Surg. 2023; 109(7):2096-2119.

PMID: 37073540 PMC: 10389510. DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000418.


References
1.
Procter L, Davenport D, Bernard A, Zwischenberger J . General surgical operative duration is associated with increased risk-adjusted infectious complication rates and length of hospital stay. J Am Coll Surg. 2010; 210(1):60-5.e1-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.09.034. View

2.
OGrady G, Angeli T, Du P, Lahr C, Lammers W, Windsor J . Abnormal initiation and conduction of slow-wave activity in gastroparesis, defined by high-resolution electrical mapping. Gastroenterology. 2012; 143(3):589-598.e3. PMC: 3429650. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.05.036. View

3.
Panwar R, Pal S . The International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery definition of delayed gastric emptying and the effects of various surgical modifications on the occurrence of delayed gastric emptying after pancreatoduodenectomy. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2017; 16(4):353-363. DOI: 10.1016/S1499-3872(17)60037-7. View

4.
Sugiyama M, Abe N, Ueki H, Masaki T, Mori T, Atomi Y . A new reconstruction method for preventing delayed gastric emptying after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Am J Surg. 2004; 187(6):743-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.10.013. View

5.
Zureikat A, Nguyen K, Bartlett D, Zeh H, Moser A . Robotic-assisted major pancreatic resection and reconstruction. Arch Surg. 2010; 146(3):256-61. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.246. View