» Articles » PMID: 28038966

Robotic Approach Mitigates Perioperative Morbidity in Obese Patients Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Overview
Journal HPB (Oxford)
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2017 Jan 1
PMID 28038966
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The aim was to evaluate the impact of obesity on perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) compared to open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD).

Methods: A retrospective review of all pancreaticoduodenectomies from 9/2011 to 4/2015 was performed. Obesity was defined as body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m.

Results: Of 474 pancreaticoduodenectomies performed: RPD = 213 (45%) and OPD = 261 (55%). A total of 145 (31%) patients were obese (70 RPD, 75 OPD). Obese patients had increased EBL (p = 0.03), pancreatic fistula (B&C; p = 0.077), and wound infection (p = 0.068) compared to the non-obese. For obese patients, RPD had decreased OR time (p = 0.0003), EBL (p < 0.001), and wound infection (p = 0.001) with no difference in Clavien ≥3 complications, margins, LOS or 30-day mortality compared with OPD. In multivariate analysis, obesity was the strongest predictor of Clavien ≥3 (OR 1.6; p = 0.041) and wound infection if BMI > 35 (OR 2.6; p = 0.03). The robotic approach was protective of Clavien ≥3 (OR 0.6; p = 0.03) on univariate analysis and wound infection (OR 0.3; p < 0.001) and grade B/C pancreatic fistula (OR 0.34; p < 0.001) on multivariate analysis.

Conclusions: Obese patients are at risk for increased postoperative complications regardless of approach. However, the robotic approach mitigates some of the increased complication rate, while preserving other perioperative outcomes.

Citing Articles

Impact of Obesity on Perioperative Outcomes in Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.

Shyr B, Shyr B, Chen S, Wang S, Shyr Y Int J Med Robot. 2024; 20(6):e70034.

PMID: 39698987 PMC: 11656678. DOI: 10.1002/rcs.70034.


The weight of BMI in impacting postoperative and oncologic outcomes in pancreaticoduodenectomy is attenuated by a robotic approach.

Shapera E, Ross S, Sucandy I, Touadi M, Pattilachan T, Christodoulou M J Robot Surg. 2024; 18(1):77.

PMID: 38353858 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01833-w.


Prevalence of and risk factors for surgical site infections after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hu H, Zhou T, Qiu Y, Li Y, Liu W, Meng R Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024; 86(1):439-455.

PMID: 38222754 PMC: 10783382. DOI: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001455.


Challenge in optimizing robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy including nerve plexus hanging maneuver: a Japanese single center experience of 76 cases.

Mizumoto T, Takahara T, Nishimura A, Mii S, Uchida Y, Iwama H Surg Endosc. 2024; 38(2):1077-1087.

PMID: 38168732 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10653-2.


Advantages of robotic gastrectomy for overweight patients with gastric cancer: a comparison study of robotic gastrectomy and conventional laparoscopic gastrectomy.

Komatsu M, Kinoshita T, Akimoto E, Yoshida M, Nagata H, Habu T Surg Today. 2023; 53(11):1260-1268.

PMID: 37024640 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-023-02681-1.