» Articles » PMID: 29992283

Epigenetic Regulation in Development: is the Mouse a Good Model for the Human?

Overview
Date 2018 Jul 12
PMID 29992283
Citations 57
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Over the past few years, advances in molecular technologies have allowed unprecedented mapping of epigenetic modifications in gametes and during early embryonic development. This work is allowing a detailed genomic analysis, which for the first time can answer long-standing questions about epigenetic regulation and reprogramming, and highlights differences between mouse and human, the implications of which are only beginning to be explored.

Objective And Rationale: In this review, we summarise new low-cell molecular methods enabling the interrogation of epigenetic information in gametes and early embryos, the mechanistic insights these have provided, and contrast the findings in mouse and human.

Search Methods: Relevant studies were identified by PubMed search.

Outcomes: We discuss the levels of epigenetic regulation, from DNA modifications to chromatin organisation, during mouse gametogenesis, fertilisation and pre- and post-implantation development. The recently characterised features of the oocyte epigenome highlight its exceptionally unique regulatory landscape. The chromatin organisation and epigenetic landscape of both gametic genomes are rapidly reprogrammed after fertilisation. This extensive epigenetic remodelling is necessary for zygotic genome activation, but the mechanistic link remains unclear. While the vast majority of epigenetic information from the gametes is erased in pre-implantation development, new insights suggest that repressive histone modifications from the oocyte may mediate a novel mechanism of imprinting. To date, the characterisation of epigenetics in human development has been almost exclusively limited to DNA methylation profiling; these data reinforce that the global dynamics are conserved between mouse and human. However, as we look closer, it is becoming apparent that the mechanisms regulating these dynamics are distinct. These early findings emphasise the importance of investigations of fundamental epigenetic mechanisms in both mouse and humans.

Wider Implications: Failures in epigenetic regulation have been implicated in human disease and infertility. With increasing maternal age and use of reproductive technologies in countries all over the world, it is becoming ever more important to understand the necessary processes required to establish a developmentally competent embryo. Furthermore, it is essential to evaluate the extent to which these epigenetic patterns are sensitive to such technologies and other adverse environmental exposures.

Citing Articles

Stromal cells and epigenetics: emerging key players of chronic inflammatory skin diseases.

Kim J, Detmar M BMB Rep. 2024; 57(11):465-471.

PMID: 39219048 PMC: 11608854.


Overlapping peri-implantation phenotypes of ZNHIT1 and ZNHIT2 despite distinct functions during early mouse development†.

He X, Taylor L, Miao X, Shi Y, Lin X, Yang Z Biol Reprod. 2024; 111(5):1017-1029.

PMID: 39194072 PMC: 11565232. DOI: 10.1093/biolre/ioae128.


Uncovering the role of TET2-mediated ENPEP activation in trophoblast cell fate determination.

Huang W, Chen A, Wei X, Fong S, Yeung W, Lee Y Cell Mol Life Sci. 2024; 81(1):270.

PMID: 38886218 PMC: 11335190. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-024-05306-z.


Prenatal exposure to Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate and high-fat diet synergistically disrupts gonadal function in male mice†.

Barakat R, Lin P, Bunnell M, Oh J, Rattan S, Arnieri C Biol Reprod. 2024; 110(5):1025-1037.

PMID: 38381622 PMC: 11094389. DOI: 10.1093/biolre/ioae029.


Challenges in Translating Regenerative Therapies for Spinal Cord Injury.

Stewart A, Gensel J, Jones L, Fouad K Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2024; 29(Suppl):23-43.

PMID: 38174141 PMC: 10759906. DOI: 10.46292/sci23-00044S.


References
1.
Ehmcke J, Wistuba J, Schlatt S . Spermatogonial stem cells: questions, models and perspectives. Hum Reprod Update. 2006; 12(3):275-82. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmk001. View

2.
Yan L, Yang M, Guo H, Yang L, Wu J, Li R . Single-cell RNA-Seq profiling of human preimplantation embryos and embryonic stem cells. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2013; 20(9):1131-9. DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.2660. View

3.
Wu J, Huang B, Chen H, Yin Q, Liu Y, Xiang Y . The landscape of accessible chromatin in mammalian preimplantation embryos. Nature. 2016; 534(7609):652-7. DOI: 10.1038/nature18606. View

4.
Pliushch G, Schneider E, Weise D, El Hajj N, Tresch A, Seidmann L . Extreme methylation values of imprinted genes in human abortions and stillbirths. Am J Pathol. 2010; 176(3):1084-90. PMC: 2832130. DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090764. View

5.
Zhao Y, Garcia B . Comprehensive Catalog of Currently Documented Histone Modifications. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015; 7(9):a025064. PMC: 4563710. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a025064. View