» Articles » PMID: 29985021

Memory Guides the Processing of Event Changes for Older and Younger Adults

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2018 Jul 10
PMID 29985021
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Memory for related past experiences can guide current perceptions. However, memory can lead one astray if situational features have changed. Thus, to adaptively use memory to guide perception, one needs to retrieve relevant memories and also to register differences between remembered and current events. Event Memory Retrieval and Comparison Theory proposes that observers associatively activate memories of related previous episodes, and that this guides their ongoing perception. Conflicts between previous and current event features can hurt immediate performance, but if changes are registered and encoded they can lead to highly effective encoding of the prior event, current event, and their relationship. Disruption of these mechanisms could play a role in older adults' greater susceptibility to event memory interference. Two experiments tested these hypotheses by asking participants to watch movies depicting two fictive days of an actor. Some activities were repeated across days, others were repeated with a changed feature (e.g., or a ), and others were performed only on Day 2. One week after watching the Day 2 movie, participants completed a cued-recall test. Changes that participants detected but did not remember led to proactive interference in recall, but changes that were successfully detected and remembered led to Younger adults detected and remembered more changes than older adults, which partly explained older adults' differential memory deficit for changed activities. These findings suggest a role for episodic reminding in event perception and a potential source of age differences in event memory. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Citing Articles

Metacontrol instructions lead to adult-like event segmentation in adolescents.

Zhou X, Ghorbani F, Roessner V, Hommel B, Prochnow A, Beste C Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2025; 72:101521.

PMID: 39892154 PMC: 11833649. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2025.101521.


Semantic relatedness proactively benefits learning, memory, and interdependence across episodes.

Bennion K, Phong J, Le M, Cheng K, Wahlheim C, Antony J Elife. 2024; 13.

PMID: 39656090 PMC: 11630824. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.95480.


Integration of overlapping sequences emerges with consolidation through medial prefrontal cortex neural ensembles and hippocampal-cortical connectivity.

Tompary A, Davachi L Elife. 2024; 13.

PMID: 39545928 PMC: 11567667. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.84359.


Correcting fake news headlines after repeated exposure: memory and belief accuracy in younger and older adults.

Kemp P, Loaiza V, Kelley C, Wahlheim C Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024; 9(1):55.

PMID: 39183253 PMC: 11345346. DOI: 10.1186/s41235-024-00585-3.


The metacontrol of event segmentation-A neurophysiological and behavioral perspective.

Zhou X, Ghorbani F, Roessner V, Hommel B, Prochnow A, Beste C Hum Brain Mapp. 2024; 45(11):e26727.

PMID: 39081074 PMC: 11289429. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26727.


References
1.
Jennings J, Jacoby L . Automatic versus intentional uses of memory: aging, attention, and control. Psychol Aging. 1993; 8(2):283-93. DOI: 10.1037//0882-7974.8.2.283. View

2.
Flores S, Bailey H, Eisenberg M, Zacks J . Event segmentation improves event memory up to one month later. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017; 43(8):1183-1202. PMC: 5542882. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000367. View

3.
Wahlheim C, Zacks J . Memory guides the processing of event changes for older and younger adults. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018; 148(1):30-50. PMC: 6312502. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000458. View

4.
Balota D, Duchek J, Paullin R . Age-related differences in the impact of spacing, lag, and retention interval. Psychol Aging. 1989; 4(1):3-9. DOI: 10.1037//0882-7974.4.1.3. View

5.
Baldassano C, Chen J, Zadbood A, Pillow J, Hasson U, Norman K . Discovering Event Structure in Continuous Narrative Perception and Memory. Neuron. 2017; 95(3):709-721.e5. PMC: 5558154. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.06.041. View