» Articles » PMID: 35704025

Semantic Relatedness Retroactively Boosts Memory and Promotes Memory Interdependence Across Episodes

Overview
Journal Elife
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Jun 15
PMID 35704025
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Two fundamental issues in memory research concern when later experiences strengthen or weaken initial memories and when the two memories become linked or remain independent. A promising candidate for explaining these issues is semantic relatedness. Here, across five paired-associate learning experiments (N=1000), we systematically varied the semantic relatedness between initial and later cues, initial and later targets, or both. We found that learning retroactively benefited long-term memory performance for semantically related words (vs. unshown control words), and these benefits increased as a function of relatedness. Critically, memory dependence between initial and later pairs also increased with relatedness, suggesting that pre-existing semantic relationships promote interdependence for memories formed across episodes. We also found that modest retroactive benefits, but not interdependencies, emerged when subjects learned via studying rather than practice testing. These findings demonstrate that semantic relatedness during new learning retroactively strengthens old associations while scaffolding new ones into well-fortified memory traces.

Citing Articles

The memorability of voices is predictable and consistent across listeners.

Revsine C, Goldberg E, Bainbridge W Nat Hum Behav. 2025; .

PMID: 40011684 DOI: 10.1038/s41562-025-02112-w.


Semantic relatedness proactively benefits learning, memory, and interdependence across episodes.

Bennion K, Phong J, Le M, Cheng K, Wahlheim C, Antony J Elife. 2024; 13.

PMID: 39656090 PMC: 11630824. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.95480.


Semantic associations restore neural encoding mechanisms.

Moore I, Long N Learn Mem. 2024; 31(3).

PMID: 38503491 PMC: 11000581. DOI: 10.1101/lm.053996.124.


Conceptual relatedness promotes memory generalization at the cost of detailed recollection.

Melega G, Sheldon S Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):15575.

PMID: 37730718 PMC: 10511542. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-40803-4.


Predictions transform memories: How expected versus unexpected events are integrated or separated in memory.

Bein O, Gasser C, Amer T, Maril A, Davachi L Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2023; 153:105368.

PMID: 37619645 PMC: 10591973. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105368.


References
1.
Kenett Y, Levi E, Anaki D, Faust M . The semantic distance task: Quantifying semantic distance with semantic network path length. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017; 43(9):1470-1489. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000391. View

2.
Negley J, Kelley C, Jacoby L . The importance of time to think back: The role of reminding in retroactive effects of memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018; 44(9):1352-1364. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000512. View

3.
Wixted J . The psychology and neuroscience of forgetting. Annu Rev Psychol. 2004; 55:235-69. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141555. View

4.
Popov V, Zhang Q, Koch G, Calloway R, Coutanche M . Semantic knowledge influences whether novel episodic associations are represented symmetrically or asymmetrically. Mem Cognit. 2019; 47(8):1567-1581. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-019-00950-4. View

5.
Talmi D, Moscovitch M . Can semantic relatedness explain the enhancement of memory for emotional words?. Mem Cognit. 2004; 32(5):742-51. DOI: 10.3758/bf03195864. View