Comparison of Lumbar Total Disc Replacement With Surgical Spinal Fusion for the Treatment of Single-Level Degenerative Disc Disease: A Meta-Analysis of 5-Year Outcomes From Randomized Controlled Trials

Overview

Journal Global Spine J

Publisher Sage Publications

Date 2018 Jul 7

PMID 29977727

Citations 22

Authors

Jack Zigler

Matthew F Gornet

Nicole Ferko

Chris Cameron

Francine W Schranck

Leena Patel

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Study Design: Meta-analysis.

Objectives: To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of total disc replacement (TDR) compared with fusion in patients with functionally disabling chronic low back pain due to single-level lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD) at 5 years.

Methods: PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched for randomized controlled trials reporting outcomes at 5 years for TDR compared with fusion in patients with single-level lumbar DDD. Outcomes included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) success, back pain scores, reoperations, and patient satisfaction. All analyses were conducted using a random-effects model; analyses were reported as relative risk (RR) ratios and mean differences (MDs). Sensitivity analyses were conducted for different outcome definitions, high loss to follow-up, and high heterogeneity.

Results: The meta-analysis included 4 studies. TDR patients had a significantly greater likelihood of ODI success (RR 1.0912; 95% CI 1.0004, 1.1903) and patient satisfaction (RR 1.13; 95% CI 1.03, 1.24) and a significantly lower risk of reoperation (RR 0.52; 95% CI 0.35, 0.77) than fusion patients. There was no association with improvement in back pain scores whether patients received TDR or fusion (MD -2.79; 95% CI -8.09, 2.51). Most results were robust to sensitivity analyses. Results for ODI success and patient satisfaction were sensitive to different outcome definitions but remained in favor of TDR.

Conclusions: TDR is an effective alternative to fusion for lumbar DDD. It offers several clinical advantages over the longer term that can benefit the patient and reduce health care burden, without additional safety consequences.

Citing Articles

Lumbar total disk replacement versus microsurgical lumbar discectomy in treatment of radicular and back pain in railway workers: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Byvaltsev V, Kalinin A, Pestryakov Y, Yuldashev R, Aliyev M J Spine Surg. 2025; 10(4):642-652.

PMID: 39816781 PMC: 11732328. DOI: 10.21037/jss-24-63.

Lumbar intervertebral disc replacement in Australia: An epidemiological study.

Dragan Z, George A, Campbell R, Gray R, Sivakumar B, Symes M J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2024; 15(3):338-342.

PMID: 39483838 PMC: 11524562. DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_119_24.

Lumbar Total Disc Replacements for Degenerative Disc Disease: A Systematic Review of Outcomes With a Minimum of 5 years Follow-Up.

Wen D, Tavakoli J, Tipper J Global Spine J. 2024; 14(6):1827-1837.

PMID: 38263726 PMC: 11268302. DOI: 10.1177/21925682241228756.

Study of mechanical effects of lumbar disc arthroplasty on facet joints at the index level/adjacent levels by using a validated finite element analysis.

Zot F, Ben-Brahim E, Severyns M, Ledoux Y, Mesnard M, Caille L Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023; 11:1287197.

PMID: 38076418 PMC: 10703171. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1287197.

In Vitro Wear of a Novel Vitamin E Crosslinked Polyethylene Lumbar Total Joint Replacement.

Siskey R, Yarbrough R, Spece H, Hodges S, Humphreys S, Kurtz S Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(10).

PMID: 37892928 PMC: 10604298. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10101198.

References

Yue J, Garcia Jr R, Miller L . The activL(®) Artificial Disc: a next-generation motion-preserving implant for chronic lumbar discogenic pain. Med Devices (Auckl). 2016; 9:75-84. PMC: 4869850. DOI: 10.2147/MDER.S102949. View

Jacobs W, Van Der Gaag N, Tuschel A, de Kleuver M, Peul W, Verbout A . Total disc replacement for chronic back pain in the presence of disc degeneration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; (9):CD008326. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008326.pub2. View

Hozo S, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I . Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005; 5:13. PMC: 1097734. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-13. View

Zhang C, Berven S, Fortin M, Weber M . Adjacent Segment Degeneration Versus Disease After Lumbar Spine Fusion for Degenerative Pathology: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of the Literature. Clin Spine Surg. 2016; 29(1):21-9. DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000328. View

Rao M, Cao S . Artificial total disc replacement versus fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013; 134(2):149-58. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-013-1905-4. View

Dettori J . Loss to follow-up. Evid Based Spine Care J. 2012; 2(1):7-10. PMC: 3427970. DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1267080. View

Mirza S, Deyo R, Heagerty P, Turner J, Martin B, Comstock B . One-year outcomes of surgical versus nonsurgical treatments for discogenic back pain: a community-based prospective cohort study. Spine J. 2013; 13(11):1421-33. PMC: 4699569. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.05.047. View

Capkin E, Karkucak M, Cakirbay H, Topbas M, Karaca A, Kose M . The prevalence and risk factors of low back pain in the eastern Black Sea region of Turkey. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2015; 28(4):783-7. DOI: 10.3233/BMR-150584. View

Katsimihas M, Bailey C, Issa K, Fleming J, Rosas-Arellano P, Bailey S . Prospective clinical and radiographic results of CHARITÉ III artificial total disc arthroplasty at 2- to 7-year follow-up: a Canadian experience. Can J Surg. 2010; 53(6):408-4145. PMC: 2993028. View

10.

Noshchenko A, Hoffecker L, Lindley E, Burger E, Cain C, Patel V . Long-term Treatment Effects of Lumbar Arthrodeses in Degenerative Disk Disease: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014; 28(9):E493-521. DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000124. View

11.

Siepe C, Heider F, Wiechert K, Hitzl W, Ishak B, Mayer M . Mid- to long-term results of total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective analysis with 5- to 10-year follow-up. Spine J. 2014; 14(8):1417-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.08.028. View

12.

Berg S, Tullberg T, Branth B, Olerud C, Tropp H . Total disc replacement compared to lumbar fusion: a randomised controlled trial with 2-year follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2009; 18(10):1512-9. PMC: 2899375. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-1047-0. View

13.

Walker B, Muller R, Grant W . Low back pain in Australian adults: prevalence and associated disability. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004; 27(4):238-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2004.02.002. View

14.

Wei J, Song Y, Sun L, Lv C . Comparison of artificial total disc replacement versus fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int Orthop. 2013; 37(7):1315-25. PMC: 3685666. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-1883-8. View

15.

Guyer R, Pettine K, Roh J, Dimmig T, Coric D, McAfee P . Comparison of 2 lumbar total disc replacements: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter Food and Drug Administration trial with 24-month follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014; 39(12):925-31. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000319. View

16.

Johnsen L, Brinckmann P, Hellum C, Rossvoll I, Leivseth G . Segmental mobility, disc height and patient-reported outcomes after surgery for degenerative disc disease: a prospective randomised trial comparing disc replacement and multidisciplinary rehabilitation. Bone Joint J. 2013; 95-B(1):81-9. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B1.29829. View

17.

van den Eerenbeemt K, Ostelo R, van Royen B, Peul W, Van Tulder M . Total disc replacement surgery for symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disease: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J. 2010; 19(8):1262-80. PMC: 2989191. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1445-3. View

18.

Siepe C, Mayer H, Wiechert K, Korge A . Clinical results of total lumbar disc replacement with ProDisc II: three-year results for different indications. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(17):1923-32. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000228780.06569.e8. View

19.

Garcia Jr R, Yue J, Blumenthal S, Coric D, Patel V, Leary S . Lumbar Total Disc Replacement for Discogenic Low Back Pain: Two-year Outcomes of the activL Multicenter Randomized Controlled IDE Clinical Trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015; 40(24):1873-81. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001245. View

20.

Chou R, Atlas S, Stanos S, Rosenquist R . Nonsurgical interventional therapies for low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society clinical practice guideline. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009; 34(10):1078-93. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a103b1. View